in the vicinity ofthe video Howard Kurtz: 2020-aspiring to make a partisan push in the Form of process reforms
Elizabeth Warren wants to get rid of the Electoral College.
You is billing this as a step in the direction of reform.
“Every vote counts”, the U.S. senator from Massachusetts, told CNN, “and by the way, how can we, what happens is that we get rid of the national vote, and the Electoral College.”
She argues that the presidential candidates not campaign in places like California and Massachusetts because they are not swing states, instead focusing on the battlefields and win up to.
This is true, but if you abolished the school of tomorrow, which candidate would buzz the camp in such mega-States like New York, California, Florida and Texas, in an effort to run their referendum. The University is forcing people to move to the country, in particular for smaller member States, whose handful of electoral votes could be decisive.
I have mixed feelings about the Electoral College, which has been debated seemingly forever. It seems like a relic from the 18th century. Century. It has a musty, anti-democratic smell to him.
But the old rules will help the winner by exaggerating their margin of victory. And it avoids the nightmare of a national recount in a contested election, a disaster, the people are nostalgic for Florida’s hanging chads.
DEMOCRATS ” CALLS FOR THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE, THE SUPREME COURT PANIC: LARA TRUMP REVEAL
Still, Warren’s new-found passion for the dumping of the election Committee is driven by the Democratic primary policy. Without that part of the Constitution, Al Gore would have won the presidency in 2000, and Hillary Clinton victory would be rich in 2016.
Democrats feel the University will hold a lock for the White house, so it is a new type of red meat. Why else would a candidate like Warren would get upset about a constitutional amendment that would take years to pass?
Colorado was just drawing the 12th state to a compact indication of the electoral votes to the national popular vote winner, even if the candidate loses, Colorado. The deal would, in effect, as States vote with 270 electoral sign-on, but now it is 181.
OPINION: IN DEFENSE OF the election Committee — and the NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE INTERSTATE COMPACT IS A Big MISTAKE
Meanwhile, Warren, Kamala Harris and Kirsten Gillibrand added, pressure to expand the Supreme court. The three 2020 candidate told Politico do you support the idea, Warren said, would you about depoliticizing “” of the high court.
But their motivation is not hard to divine. First, Democrats open to complain, with much justification that they were wrongly denied a Senate vote on Merrick Garland’s nomination in 2016.
The second President, Trump has already named 91 a Federal judge to come up with the views of many, many more.
2020 DEMOCRATS EYE A DRAMATIC INCREASE OF THE JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT: “ALL OPTIONS ARE ON THE TABLE”
But all of this is reminiscent of FDR’s court-packing scheme, was a political mistake. Some Democrats want the 15 judges on the court. Apparently, see this as a way to fix the fact that the court addressed a clear conservative majority — a point that the Trump yesterday at a press conference in the prediction, it would never happen.
“The only reason why you do try to catch up,” Trump said. “So, if you can’t catch up by the urn with the winning of an election, you want to try to do it in a different way.”
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Even the insistence of a prayer, the Democrats would have to win not only the White house but a large Senate majority in the year 2020.
In both cases, the Democratic candidates are embracing to sell these ideas to try and the blatantly partisan move as a process of reforms.
These are the kind of abstract policy debates to motivate while important, are hardly the electorate as much as climate change or health care. But what to include Warren and company, that she could inspire the kind of activists in the Democratic primaries.