Some Washington lawmakers have recently expressed worries that Huawei’s appear in countries with security ties with the U.S. could make their networks more vulnerable to Beijing sniff.
Washington is cranking up pressure on Huawei Technologies Co., the Chinese telecommunications-equipment maker, which AMERICAN officials see as a potential instrument for state-sponsored espionage.
But on the other side of the Atlantic, one of America’s allies has taken a different approach. The british Prime Minister Theresa meets Huawei Chairwoman Sun Yafang in Beijing earlier this month. Days later, Huawei announced that it would invest £3 billion ($4.2 billion) in the united kingdom in the next five years.
Britain’s embrace of Huawei is broadening a gap between the united states and some key allies about the U.s. allegations in the company poses a cybersecurity threat. Some Washington lawmakers have recently expressed worries that Huawei’s appear in countries with security ties with the U.S. could make their networks more vulnerable to Beijing sniff.
In 2012, a US congressional report labeled Huawei a national security threat, says its equipment will enable China to spy or disable telecommunications networks. Smaller US carriers use Huawei gear, but the report was politically difficult for larger companies, such as asAT&T Inc., to do this.
Almost everywhere outside the united states, Huawei has grown into a behemoth. It is the world’s third-largest smartphone company after Samsung Electronics Co. and Apple Inc. And it has leapfrogged Ericsson and Nokia Corp., the world’s largest maker of telecom equipment—things such as switches, routers and gsm tower acceleration.
How does the U.S. defend itself against cybersecurity threats?
As wireless carriers around the world to prepare to upgrade to a faster generation of network technology, called 5G, Huawei has emerged as one of the industry’s biggest players.
The wide concern in Washington that Beijing could force Huawei to make use of the knowledge of his own hardware design to spy on the Americans or cripple communication. Some intelligence officials also fear of Huawei equipment could have security vulnerabilities that could be exploited to remotely control or disable the acceleration.
“We are deeply concerned about the risks of allowing any company or entity that is required to foreign governments, which do not share in our values to get positions of power in our telecommunications networks,” said Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Christopher Wray, at a senate committee hearing earlier this month. Lawmakers in the House and the Senate have introduced separate bills at the bar of the U.S. government and its contractors from the use of Huawei gear.
“We are deeply concerned about the risks of allowing any company or entity that is required to foreign governments, which do not share in our values to get positions of power in our telecommunications networks.”
– FBI Director Christopher Wray
A Huawei spokesman said the company is employee-owned and no government has ever been asked to spy on another country. The company said that it poses no greater cybersecurity risk than other suppliers, because the telecom industry shares global supply chain and production capabilities.
“Huawei is aware of the range of U.S. government activities apparently aimed at the brakes of Huawei’s business in the U.S. market,” the company said in a statement. “Huawei is trusted by governments and customers in 170 countries around the world.”
That is what worries some people in Washington. Of particular importance is Huawei’s large presence in countries in the “Five Eyes” sharing of partnership with the AMERICAN Governments of Britain, Canada and Australia to major phone providers in their respective countries to use Huawei equipment, but special investigation of Huawei gear. New Zealand, where Huawei gear is also used on a large scale, is the fifth coalition member.
Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D., Md.), co-author of the 2012 report, and Rep. Mike Conaway (R., Texas), who introduced the House bill, both cite the use of Huawei equipment by Five Eyes allies as the AMERICAN national-security vulnerability.
“Our partners’ willingness to compromise of their systems in terms of infiltration put on the risk of the information we share and the coordinated actions that can be developed,” said Michael Wessel, a member of the U. S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. The body reports to the Congress on the national security implications of the trade and economic relations between the two countries.
Richard Yu, CEO of Huawei’s consumer products division.
The uk’s National Cyber Security Centre, an intelligence-agency division, said telecom systems related to united kingdom national security and are managed differently than carrier-controlled networks the general public uses. In a statement on behalf of the British government, the NCSC called Huawei “a global company is important.” It said that the “government and British telecom operators are working with Huawei in the country and abroad to ensure the uk can continue to take advantage of new technology, while the management of cyber security risks.”
The united kingdom was the first major European market to welcome Huawei telecommunications equipment. In 2005, Huawei landed a large contract for the delivery of BT Group PLC with the phone switches, and other infrastructure.
The british intelligence officials at the time a reservation is made to BT about the use of Huawei equipment, but lacked the authority to order a private company to do so, a person familiar with the matter said. A BT spokesman declined to comment.
Behind the scenes at the DHS cybersecurity center
Today, two of the country’s largest phone providers, BT and Vodafone Group PLC, is using Huawei equipment. Huawei last year opened a joint lab with the University of Edinburgh for research data management and processing.
Huawei has about 1500 employees in the uk has recruited British business and the government celebrities, such as John Browne, former CEO of oil giant BP PLC, for the filling of the board of directors of the UK activities.
In 2009, the British secret leaders warned lawmakers that China could use Huawei remote to pause or disable a telecommunication network. The convenience is concerned, Huawei the following year opened a testing laboratory in Banbury, England, near Oxford.
There are about 30 people with a U. K. security clearances disassemble Huawei equipment and evaluate hardware and software for security vulnerabilities. Huawei funds and works at the lab, and the staff of Huawei employees. Monitoring the functioning of a board of directors composed of mostly senior British intelligence officials, as well as three Huawei representatives.
David George-Cosh in Toronto contributed to this article.