in the vicinityVideoThe New York Times issues correction for justice Kavanaugh-report
Antjuan Seawright, and Lili Gil Valetta respond.
President Trump, The New York Times called on the Monday after the newspaper made a fundamental revision to say in an article about the new sexual misconduct allegations against judge Brett Kavanaugh, his Supreme court will select the “attacked” by these late-breaking accounts.
Over the weekend, the released in what was seen as a bomb, a report that a previously unknown allegation against Kavanaugh, to update only to later to observe the piece, friends of the alleged victim said she did not remember the alleged sexual assaults. In the update the times are also given, for the first time, that the alleged victims refused to be interviewed.
KAVANAUGH ‘MUST BE ARRAIGNED, TOP DEMS SAY, AS AN UNSUBSTANTIATED ALLEGATION RESURFACES
“Who here is actually justice attacked Kavanaugh – Attacked by lies and Fake news!” Trump said in a tweet, after citing a “Fox & Friends” discussion, the Time to update. “This is all about the LameStream-Media work, with your partner, the Dems.”
The original Times piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, adapted from their forthcoming book, argues that Kavanaugh’s classmates from the Clinton-connected non-profit CEO, Max Stier, “saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down to another drunken dorm party, where friends, pushed his penis in the hand of a student.”
To discuss according to the times, the bull “designated senators, and the FBI is aware of this account” last year, during the Kavanaugh hearings, “but the FBI did not investigate, and Mr. bull has refused, in public.”
The times,’ revision confirmed the original article was a key detail: “editors’ note: An earlier version of this article was adapted from a soon to be released book, not an element of a book-account in respect of a claim by a Yale classmate, the friends of Brett Kavanaugh shoved his penis in the hand of a schoolgirl in a drunken dorm party. The paper reported that the student refused to be interviewed and friends say that they don’t remember the incident. This information has been added to the article.”
By this time, however, many Democratic presidential candidates have already the quoted reporting call to new for Kavanaugh’s indictment.
Also, in the course of the article update, the presidential candidate Tom Steyer, the choir met on Monday morning, said in a statement: “If the only way to start to the truth, an impeachment process for justice Kavanaugh, I support that process immediately.”
The update to the times, ” – the report came only after The Federal the Mollie Hemingway, who reviewed an advance copy of the book, the first featured article is the omission on Twitter, to the press and other commentators, the Problem.
The President went on to call those behind the story “TERRIBLE PEOPLE” and claiming to influence you would be the court to try Kavanaugh’s opinion and should be sued.
“BELIEVE WHAT THESE TERRIBLE PEOPLE DO OR SAY,” Trump said. “You seek to destroy, and influence on his mind – but played the game badly. You should be sued!”
This agreed with the statements Trump has to report on Sunday in response to the first Time.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“Brett Kavanaugh should start suing for libel, or the Ministry of justice should come to his rescue. The lies about him incredibly,” the President tweeted are told. He also accused the Democrats and the media are trying to “scare him” in always a liberal.
Kavanaugh, swung to the Democrats during his confirmation process as a hardline conservative, has shown an independent streak, while the Supreme court is the final deadline, together with the liberal judges on several occasions.
Representatives of the sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, who is the Senate judiciary Committee stated that if other allegations against Kavanaugh, commented on what they claimed were other shortcomings in the times reporting. The article included a discussion of the previously known assertion that Kavanaugh had his penis in front of the face by Deborah Ramirez at a college party, but Grassley called the team the times for leaving out important details about the allegations.
“@NYTimes not Sen. apply Grassley’s office for this story. If that were the case, we would have reminded them, a couple of important public facts left out,” Grassley team wrote. “Despite 7 attempts of staff, Mrs Ramirez’s lawyers to provide the rejected evidence referred to in the article/witness-accounts to support the claims. They also refused invitations for Ms. Ramirez to speak to the Committee investigators or provide a written explanation.”
Fox News, Gregg Re, Andrew craft, and Chad contributed Pergram of this report.