News

Trump management dump Obama-era rule, the trade unions, siphon Medicaid money

in the vicinity


Video

Napolitano: SCOTUS strikes hard against the public sector, the trade unions

Judge Napolitano’s chambers: judge Andrew Napolitano explains the relevance of the Supreme court decision against mandatory Union dues.

The Trump administration announced Tuesday it planned to end, what he suggested was an illegal Obama-era rule, to gather the trade unions fees, government subsidies for private health workers including care-giving family members.

Federal law generally States prohibits of skimming money from Medicaid payments is bound for independent in-home personal care workers. But in the year 2014, the Obama administration created an exception to this, namely, that States could divert some of the Medicaid money for the unions, on the theory that these workers were effectively employed in the public sector.

Eleven left-leaning States have used to increase the provision of more than $200 million per year for the trade unions by taking the health of the workers, who often do not realize it even, it, to top GOP officials.

These States include California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Illinois — blue state, was in the midst of the recent decisions of the Supreme court, stripping power from the organised labour movement.

SUPREME COURT BLOW FOR UNIONS

But GOP leaders, said the Obama administration exception against the Federal Social Security Act, as well as the rights of home health workers.

The Trump-government means the decision that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has begun the formal process of the proposal for a new rule rolled back the Obama regulation.

“The law provides that Medicaid provider must be paid directly and not part of their payments are diverted to a third party outside of a few very special exceptions,” Tim Hill, Deputy Director of the center for Medicaid and CHIP services, in a statement. “This proposed rule is to ensure that provider, you will receive your full payment, and all the circumstances in which a state is not to distract the part of the supplier payment must be clearly allowed under the law.”

“Union dues skimming directs Medicaid funds from the people to help the program.”

GOP Wisconsin sen Ron Johnson

House Republicans have long sought to pull the plug on the Obama-era rule, which you have characterized as unethical and illegal. Wisconsin GOP Sen. Ron Johnson, the Chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, had pushed to take the trombone administration, measures on the issue earlier this year.

In a statement, Johnson told Fox News that he would continue to monitor Medicaid funding.

“Union dues skimming directs Medicaid funds from the people, which help the program,” Johnson said. “I welcome the trump to rein in Administration for the first steps in this abuse. My Committee will continue to carry out the supervision of the CMS for the care of the Medicaid funds so that the American taxpayer is money that is in distress can trust.”

The so-called charges of skimming continues to occur in spite of a 2014 Supreme court ruling that home health workers could not be constitutionally obliged, union Agency fees, because they have no public sector.

Press RELEASE: Statement of the melody Benjamin, a Home-Care Worker, About Trump management’s Proposed rule to silence people and to Limit the Supreme court of justice of the Ruling Power. https://t.co/vUKqtRTzxq

— SEIU (@SEIU) July 10, 2018

The Trump administration, the latest setback marked move for the unions. Last month, the Supreme court is another blow for organized labor in Janus v. AFSCME, which held that nonunion public employees could not be compelled Agency fees, the public unions dealt.

It was a long time forbidden to force the trade unions, members have to pay for their explicitly political activity, but the Supreme court ruling extended the prohibition of the payment of the Agency fees, to say also those, the expenditure amounted to unconstitutional forced to participate in political activity, collective bargaining.

In a statement, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) called the trump administration’s move a “comprehensive, coordinated attack against the working people,” and said it hurt minorities.

“The proposed CMS rule, combined with the Janus-judgment, two further efforts from trump management, and billionaire-funded interest groups, not to mention workers from 90 percent women, most of whom are women of color, and to reduce the power of the working people to fight by making it harder for you to get together in a union, to ensure that our loved ones can receive the care they need to live at home with dignity,” read a statement by Melody Benjamin, the SEIU, a home-care worker said.

Gregg Re is an editor for Fox News. Follow him on Twitter @gregg_re.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular