Trump administration asks Supreme court to allow-as a rule, green cards for immigrants, to limit welfare

close tovideo Supreme court is of the hot-button docket, exactly observed, in the year 2020 election year

Correspondent David Spunt has a preview of the slate of big cases to the high court in the year 2020.

The Ministry of justice on Tuesday filed a emergency to raise the request to the Supreme court rulings on the administration of the “public charge” rule-what is green cards for immigrants, restrict is considered to be likely to rely on social assistance.

The administration issued a rule in August that the Definition of “public charge” will receive as an immigrant, the one or more specified social security benefits for more than 12 months within a 36-month period.


While a standard non-admitted “public charges” to the US part of the immigration law for decades, it has set never officially in the articles of Association. Officials say it will protect taxpayers and ensure that migrants are self-sufficient.

The reported benefits, Additional security income (SSI) and Temporary assistance for needy families (TANF), and most forms of Medicaid, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps are. The use of these services would values be taken into account when an immigrant applies for permanent residency along with standard criteria such as age, health and financial assets.

But the controversial rule to rulings of the lower courts of the Federal government. was blocked nationwide The States of Connecticut, Vermont and New York, as well as New York City and the rights of immigrants-groups that had sued over the rule. Opponents say the rule would have a deterrent effect on the migrants and prevent them, you need the help.


The DOJ wants to allow the Supreme court, the policy will be enforced temporarily, until the problems are resolved and the legal situation. The time-sensitive applications goes first to justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the respond to questions the member States to the request by the government enforcement. You will probably also ask questions, weigh your colleagues, prior to the issuance of an order in the coming days


The Trump-the justice Ministry has repeatedly to lift the Supreme court, court ordered injunctions, bypassing the traditional appellate process.

The public prosecution, the rule hits another road block last week, to lift as the Second Circuit Court of Appeals rejected an injunction imposed by a New York Federal judge in October.

US District Court judge George Daniels in October ruled that the government failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the change in the definition and the offending parts, including the integration of the knowledge of the English language, as a sign of self-sufficiency, calling it a “new Agency of the politics of exclusion in search of a justification”.

Legal and rights of immigrant groups, behind the push for the failure to make a Declaration to the Supreme court, accusing the administration to push to try what she described as a “racial wealth test” for immigrants.

“The trump-administration grasping at straws in your desperate attempt to accelerate the implementation of their racist wealth test for immigrants, even before the government heard the appeals were, by the circuit courts. is We hope the Supreme court sees this movement for what it really is, and immediately denies it,” said the statement from groups including The Legal Aid Society and Make the streets of New York.

“Now, more than ever, it is crucial that the public prosecution’s policy, which was called the lower courts, called the” counter to the American dream of prosperity and opportunity, through hard work and promotion opportunities,’ continues to be blocked,” it said.


U.S. citizenship and Immigration services, the Agency responsible for the rule remained confident about his hopes for found to be legal.

“The public charge inadmissibility rule will enforce long-standing immigration law, which Congress reaffirmed in the year 1996,” a spokesman told Fox News. “We are confident that an objective of justice will see that this rule is directly within the existing law.”

Ginsburg, part of the court’s liberal wing, has decided in favor of the Trump management for emergency requests. In December, a request from President Trump’s lawyers granted a delay in the enforcement of coercive measures house Democrats, issued on the Deutsche Bank and Capital One for the trump bank records.

Fox News’ Shannon Bream, Marta Dhanis and Marisa helped Schultz to this report.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular