File photo – Soldiers assigned to Company B, 2nd Battalion, 198th Infantry Regiment, 155th Armored Brigade Combat Team, Mississippi Army National Guard, riding in a Bradley Fighting Vehicle after an exercise in the neighbourhood of the El Jarbah training village on Doña Ana Range, N. M., April 20, 2018. (Winifred Brown, Fort Bliss Public Affairs Office)
The Army is massively touring to the fleet of Bradley Fighting Vehicles through a recent deal to add to 473 of the new infantry carriers, service officials said.
The movement is an important part of a broader Army busy with the preparation of its arsenal of armored fighting vehicles for the great power of the country by war and continue to pave the way to a new generation of combat platforms for the 2030s and beyond.
While the Army of course has thousands of Bradleys in the stock, the size of this purchase is extremely important, because, among other things, the newest generation of Bradley vehicles – something designed to lay important foundation for the longer term, a high priority under the vehicle modernization plans.
The service acquisition plan, advanced by means of a large-scale Military deal with BAE Systems, calls for the most modern Bradley M2A4 and M7A4 vehicles. This latest Bradleys are part of a strategic plan for the Bradley platform to a new era of advanced computing, digital processors, the long-range sensors, and a number of new weapons applications.
“After a decade of changes in response to threats in Iraq, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle is at or exceeds Space, Weight, and energy-Cooling limitations,” Ashley Givens, spokeswoman for the Program Executive Office, Ground Combat Systems, told Warrior Maven.
Space, Weight and Power considerations, such as Army developers describe, are an essential element of the analysis inform Bradley modernization; this means that the management of such things as weight, mobility, on-board electrical power, ammunition storage space, and electromagnetic signatures as they relate to vehicle protection and firepower.
In essence, what the chances of survival improvements necessary to counter the threats in Iraq wound up to far over the Bradley’s weight and power. For example, the Army, the developers explain that the creation of the Bradley with new suspension, reactive armor tiles and APS, it can increase the weight of the vehicle with more than 3000 pounds.
In order to address this, the Army decided to perform a series of Engineering Change Proposals for the Bradley, the specific technical adjustments to the platform that is intended to many new opportunities and enable faster and seamless integration of new systems and technologies.
Givens explained that the latest Bradley A4s are upgrades for the engine and the gearbox, cooling system modification, electrical system upgrades and the introduction of the vehicle diagnosis.
“These improvements, the buy-back lost mobility, as well as making a margin to the technologies of the future to be hosted on the platform. As an example, none of the Active Protection of the Systems that are currently being examined by the Army could be installed on the A3 Bradley because of the shortage of electrical power. The A4 is this failure,” she added.
More on-board power can bring the technical means to strong support of advanced electronics, command and control systems, computing power, sensors, networking, and even electronic warfare technologies.
The A4 configuration also include upgrades of the Bradley engine and transmission, Alicia Gray, BAE Systems combat vehicles spokeswoman, told the Warrior Maven.
The Army is also working on a new future A5 Bradley Fighting Vehicle variant may be armed with lasers, counter-drone missiles, active protection systems, improved targeting sights and increased on-board power suitable for the next generation of weapons and technologies.
Designed to be lighter in weight, more mobile and better protected, emerging Bradley A5 lethality upgrades already underway as part of a plan to build on the improvements with the A4.
These improvements are the integration of the 3rd Generation forward-looking Infrared sensors for the Commanders and Soldiers of the sights, spot trackers for the dismounted soldiers to identify targets, and an upgraded chassis with an enhanced underbelly protection, and a new munitions storage configuration, Army developers tell Warrior.
Also, while the Army Bradley developers not specifically say that they plan to arm Bradleys with laser weapons, that innovation is also within the boundaries of the possible. Working with industry, the Army has already shot down drone targets with Stryker-fired laser weapons, and the service currently has several laser weapons programs in various stages of development.
This includes mass redundancies Forward Operating Base protection laser weapons as well as vehicle-mounted lasers. A major focus for this effort, which will move to engineer a much stronger of 100 kilowatts vehicle fired laser, is highly dependent on the ability to integrate significant amounts of mobile power in armored vehicles.
Country War usa. Russian and Chinese Armored Vehicles
The Army is the speed of this type of armored vehicle weapons systems and countermeasures, partly as a result of a clear recognition that, who the U.S. Military fights, it is very likely that for a meeting with the Russian or Chinese-built armored vehicles and advanced weapons, senior service leaders told the Warrior.
As part of this equation, recognizing that Army soldiers are often understandably reluctant to formulate war plans or threat assessments, it is indeed reasonable and relevant to posit that the service war planners are looking for the full range of uncertainties – to the ground of the war with the Russian armed forces in Europe, the Iranian army in the Middle East, or even Chinese armored vehicles on the Asian continent.
The quote of Russian-made T-72 and T-90 tanks, Army senior officials seem to be aware of the fact that the U.S. will likely confront in the near-peer armored vehicles, weapons systems and technologies.
“If the Army goes in the fighting on the ground in the Middle East, we will have to deal with the equipment of Russia, Iran, and in some cases China,” a senior Army official told Warrior. “The threat is not only control of the vehicles, but unmanned Aircraft (drones), MANPADs, and other weapons.”
Bradley upgrades are also serve as a component to early conceptual work on the Army’s Next Generation combat vehicle, an entirely new platform or fleet of vehicles scheduled to appear in the 2030s.
The next Generation of vehicles, for the 2030s and beyond, the Army, the developers say, will be necessary, because there are limits to how far an existing armored vehicle can be upgraded. This requires a delicate balance between the short term operational earnings upgrades us. a longer-term, multi-year developmental approach. Each has its place, Army acquisition leaders emphasize.
The emergence of these weapons, and the rapidly changing threat calculus is also, of course, affect what Army developers call CONOPS, or the Concepts of the Activities. A larger range of sensors and weapons, of course, can translate into a more dispersed battlefield – thus emphasizing the importance of the command and control systems and weapons with enough range to outrange attacking troops. The idea of more lethality on the Bradley, is not only based on the need to destroy enemy targets, but also of fundamental importance for the importance of the adoption of suppressive fire, allowing the forces to maneuver in the battle.
As part of these preparations for the future ground of war, Army concept developers and veterans of the war are quick to point out that armored vehicles like a Bradley or even an Abrams tank, and his impact in certain counterinsurgency missions. Accordingly, the term “full-spectrum” often gets a lot of attention among the leaders of the Army, having regard to the fact that the service is proud to be “expect the unexpected”, or just suitable in the case of a control of the circumstance. The Army has now become a new Doctrinal “Activities”, an approach that places an even greater premium on winning big force in country wars.
“We have to be willing to be the face of the near-colleagues or regional actors with nuclear weapons. It is the risk of not being ready are too large,” a senior Army official said.
More Weapons and Technology – WARRIOR MAVEN (CLICK HERE)