Supreme Court seems split on DC sniper Lee Boyd Malvo potential resentencing protect

close tovideo Supreme Court review “Beltway sniper’ appeal

Lee Boyd Malvo, who was 17 years old when he and John shot Allen Muhammad killed 10 people during a three-week period in Maryland, Virginia and Washington, was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole; analysis of Fox News senior judicial analyst judge Andrew Napolitano.

The U.S. Supreme court seemed split Wednesday on whether grant Lee Boyd Malvo, one half of the “DC sniper” – the duo who terrorized the nation nearly two decades ago, a new pronouncement of the judgment.

Lawyers for Malvo argued to reconsider before the Supreme court of Malvo’s life sentence without the possibility of parole, in view of the fact that he is a minor, if he the crime.

Malvo, in addition to mastermind John Allen Muhammad killed 10 people and injured three others during a three-week rampage in October 2002. The seemingly random shots, grabbed the DC-region and the world.

The couple was eventually arrested in the vicinity of Frederick, Md., and followed in Virginia in the year 2003. The death penalty was still an option for the young people in the state.


Muhammad was executed in 2009. Malvo, a Jamaican-born 17-years-old at the time, received a life sentence without the possibility of parole.

Out of the question for the Supreme court: whether Malvo, now 34, should be resentenced in Virginia in light of a few of the recent decisions of the Supreme court, the limitation of life-without-parole sentences for youth crimes.

Justice Elena Kagan, the court’s liberal wing, said the high court’s previous case law on the subject to be understood, should, all, and, the courts were obliged to engage seriously with the notion that “youth matters” in the determination of the juvenile sentence.

On the other hand, conservative justice Samuel Alito, the court’s formulation from his previous case, the life banned only mandatory sentences without parole for juveniles should beat easily. Because Virginia is a decided Supreme court that Malvo, the judges had the option to lower Malvo sentence, he would not be entitled to any relief under the court of its previous decision.

The closely watched case could also be an opportunity for the Supreme court, after the appointment of conservative judges by President Trump to have the brakes on, leading to a gradual movement towards more lenient for young offenders.


Regardless of the case, the result, Malvo is not to walk the streets in the foreseeable future. He was sentenced to four life sentences in Virginia, and was, six further life-without-parole-conditions for filming in Maryland.

Youth advocates have, as a rule, the consent indicated by the direction of the Supreme Court juvenile sentencing in the last few years. The court often has recognized that minors should be treated differently than adults, citing their lack of maturity and a greater ability to change.

In 2005, the court eliminated the death penalty for offenders who were under the age of 18, if they have committed crimes. In 2012, the judge, the teenager said,-a murderer could not explain automatically a life sentence without chance of parole, such a sentence should rarely appropriate for minors. Four years later, the court made the decision retroactive, what other prisoners on hope.

The judges’ in 2012 and 2016, the decisions, the possibilities for inmates as Malvo go back to court to challenge their sentences.

Malvo’s lawyers argued that he be resentenced in Virginia should, because, after a jury convicted him of murder, but rejected the death penalty, he received a life without parole sentence automatically. Virginia has argued that Malvo was not automatic and that a judge exposed to had, all, or any part thereof, so Malvo should not be resentenced. Two lower courts have sided with Malvo, ruling that a court should examine whether he deserves to be one of the rare young offenders, a life without parole sentence.

Malvo the murderous spree in 2002 shook the country to its core.

Nelson Rivera, whose wife, Lori Lewis-Rivera, was killed by the DC sniper, an amicus letter submitted by the Maryland crime victims Resource Center, said that the decisions, the result could be Malvo’s resentencing “retraumatize, revictimize, and in breach of the legal and human rights of the victims.”

Victor Stone, a lawyer for the center, told The Washington Post, “people like Mr. Rivera lost a very important member of the family.” He added that new negotiations and the hope for a resentence to put “an enormous burden and revictimization to the families of the victims, the confrontation with this loss.”


The Fairfax County, Va., A Prosecutor who helped convict Malvo told WTOP he “hopes and prays” Malvo to stay in for life would, as you are.

“I’ve heard a number of people say, this is about the release of Malvo, but this is not true. It is all about the release of Malvo,” said Ray Morrogh, who was co-counsel in the case of Malvo was convicted for the murder of FBI analyst Linda Franklin.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular