Supreme Court launches election-year agenda with hot-button immigration, guns, abortion cases

close tovideo Supreme court of Louisiana abortion law

Louisiana law requires that doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges in a nearby hospital; Kristin Fischer reports.

President Trump Standard has-good-news-unique feature: its success to the appointment of a record number of judges to the Federal bench, including two judges.

Now, as the Supreme court of the United States is preparing to launch its new term Monday, a 5-4 conservative majority was poised to provide the White house with significant legal and political victories or setbacks. They are the unusual dynamics now seeping from the nation’s highest court.

The judges have ” election-year agenda includes matters with the Trump Executive power on immigration, along with LGBTQ discrimination in the workplace, gun rights and abortion laws. All of them are teed up to be argued that this term, the religious freedom and health care appeals are good bets to be added to the docket. Everything will probably be decided in a presidential election year.

“The court will be a Problem in 2020, but this is perfectly normal. It was a big issue in 2016, it helped chosen President Trump,” said Paul Smith, a Georgetown University law professor who has argued 21 cases before the high court. “And it will be so again, just because it is such an important part of our system.”


It was a trump card in the year 2016-to make a campaign promise to the judge, and the hot-button issues, you decide — a Central election campaign. He has continued to promote the theme on the stump.

“In a couple of weeks, we will judge up to 180… the Federal government, including the court of appeals judge”, he said to me in New Mexico. Sept. 16. “I have just signed up, my 150-Federal judge, and the court of appeals judges, and we already have two great judges of the Supreme court, [Neil] from gorsuch, and [Brett] Kavanaugh. Great, great men.”

To be heard on the issues of this term, the nine members of the court:

— Civil rights protection for LGBTQ workers, and whether the employer can be sued for job discrimination.

— Abortion laws, including a challenge to a Louisiana law, the restriction, the run may be the procedure.

— Immigration and Executive power, the closely watched case on the docket so far. In particular, the efforts of Trump from the DACA program for Dreamers, an Obama-era initiative to shield some young immigrants from deportation.

“I know that many of us are very nervous, what will happen if the Supreme court decides on the case,” said Gaby Pacheco, program Director at TheDream.US, bills itself as the nation’s largest college-access and success program for dreamers. “Hopefully, the DACA program is alive and let these young people live their lives.”

Despite a string of setbacks, which is believed to have said of the courts against the administration policies, especially on immigration — court-observers, Trump and his allies, that the high court will have the last word, rolling their way.

“Play the long game,” said Thomas Dupree, a longtime appellate lawyer and former top justice Department official. “There are those in the White house and the justice Department, which consists of a calculation, say: we take all these losses in the lower courts, because we are going to win the endgame in this case is in the Supreme court.”


But groups, the employed against the White house, blocked in the Federal courts with a flood of lawsuits, including more than 40 injunctions of the executive policy enforcement.

“We are absolutely a Problem with many of the Trump-government initiatives for immigrant rights, to the border wall, to pounce on his effort Roe vs Wade”, said David Cole, of the ACLU’s national legal director. “So, we have been very busy and struggling, but that is because in our view, that the Trump administration has agreed to the constitutional law in so many areas, and for the most part, the courts have with us.”


The Supreme court has jumped to selectively move the administration, in front of us with some of his politics, at least temporarily, while the controversies will be held. With a Sept. 11 order so that the go-ahead for the management of the proposed prohibition of the immigration, asylum for anyone trying to cross the southern border, the Transit through a third country such as Mexico.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor accused the Trump-Ministry of justice, and the search improperly, according to a Supreme court bailout package, and their conservative colleagues to accept everything too easily.

“To allow a stay pending appeal should be to act a ‘exceptional’. Unfortunately, it seems that the government has the introduction of this exceptional mechanism, such as a new normality. Historically, the government has made this kind of request is rare; now it does so reflexively,” she wrote in a dissent. “Not long ago, the court objected to the Association of the government now invites. I regret that my colleagues have not exercised the same restraint here.”

Many progressives have hope held out that Chief Justice John Roberts a check in the yard of the conservative March will, at least selectively.

Roberts, the President has earned the displeasure going back until 2016, if he as a “first among equals” a “disaster” and a “nightmare for the conservatives.”

But the chief justice back after Trump criticized a judge blocked its asylum policy, calling him an “Obama judge, urged the public last year.”


Roberts, in a rare rebuke of a sitting member of the high court, said in a statement: “We have no Obama, judges or to trump a judge, a Bush judge or a Clinton judge. What we have to do an extraordinary group of dedicated judges to do their best, equal rights for those who appear before you. An independent judiciary is something we should all be grateful.”

June of this year, Roberts — siding with the court’s four liberal justices — was the deciding vote, effectively blocking the administration plan to add a citizenship question to the census, in 2020.

“Certainly, the conservative wing of the Supreme Court, and now with the conservative majority, was encouraged,” said Elizabeth Wydra, the President of the Constitutional Accountability Center. “The trump administration seems to think that it is the Supreme court of justice of the votes in his back pocket. But, if it is to go to the Supreme court of justice of the decisions of Chief Justice Roberts, I’m sure, is to want, have not seen the court as a “get out of jail free” card for President trump, if a lower court to decide the secular judges, that its policies are illegal or unconstitutional.”


Court observers said Roberts has to keep a long-term agenda to the high court from a party to political disputes, if possible, to preserve the Bank’s reputation as a fair referee.

“What are trying to the court really to avoid is the perception that it and it also decides politically,” said Smith. “And, the chief justice in particular, it is his role to be a guardian of the legitimacy of the court and to try to find a way, just press again on this idea that the court and the judges will vote their policy -that they are not actually a legal institution.”


It is difficult to see how the nine justices would not, as a substantial portion of the election in 2020 discourse. In addition to the high-profile card, there is a lot to consider, for the voters to:

— The Kavanaugh confirmation in last fall, where the candidate resisted allegations of past sexual misconduct leveled by several women, in what is perhaps the most bitter, hard-fought judicial confirmation.

— Outdated progressive anger over the filling of the seat of the late Antonin Scalia. Obama’s 2016 election, judge Merrick Garland, never received a hearing or floor vote after the GOP Senate majority, the nomination froze. After a 14-month vacuum of the Senate Trump the choice of from gorsuch approved; he and Kavanaugh reliable conservative in the mold of justice Clarence Thomas.

To change — suggestions of some of the 2020 Democrats, the Tribunal, make-up, the addition of justice and the elimination of its life term.


This all adds up to a national referendum, in which unelected judges likely to be the front-and-center.

“There was a reason why people put Trump into the office, she wanted to see what the judge on its Supreme court-list” of possible candidates,” said Carrie Severino, the head of the conservative judicial crisis network, about the GOP nominee’s famous list of high court candidates from gorsuch and finally, Kavanaugh. “It is even more clear, now we have to record this track, and the stakes are even higher.”

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular