San Francisco’s homeless statistics on the rise: the city is accusing big corporations, the inhabitants of the negligence of the officials

to connectVideoLeft Behind the Homeless Crisis in San Francisco

The City by the Bay has more billionaires per head of population than anywhere else in the world, but it also has a homeless problem that is so severe that it rivals some third-world countries.

In the summer of 2019 at the latest, on Fox News, embarked on an ambitious project to chronicle the toll that progressive policies have had on the homeless crisis in four West Coast cities: Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, and Portland, Ore. In each and every city, we noticed a lack of safety and security, health and safety standards, and ethics. The people, the homeless, and advocates say they have lost faith in their elected representatives and by the ability of the problem to be solved. Most cities and towns have thrown hundreds of millions of dollars at the problem, just to look at it, it would be even worse. This is what we saw in San Francisco, california.

San Francisco is a city of extremes.

It has more billionaires per head of population than anywhere else in the world, but it also has a homeless problem that is so severe that it rivals some third-world countries. On any given day, you can see the tuned up Lamborghini’s, and blinged out trophy wives in one part of the city, you can walk over a few blocks and see the piles of human excrement, pools of urine and vomit caked on the side. The misery caused by homelessness, mental illness and addiction touches, in San Francisco, and parts of a beautiful city, in a public restroom.


If the problem is growing, people are finding themselves at a crossroads. It is compassion for those who are struggling will be constantly challenged by fear for their own safety, and quality of life. It had never been this bad, say critics, who are shocked that it is getting worse and worse each and every day.

San Francisco Mayor, London Breed, says that it is inhumane to let the drug addicts rot in the streets, but homeless advocates say that the measures in place for the mentally ill, drug addicts in a shelter and treatment for up to a year in the extreme, and it is a violation of the rights of citizens.
(AP Photo/Ben Margot)

“I will not give it to my son, who lives there,” Amelia Cartwright, told Fox News. “It’s disgusting. I went there a few months ago, for the first time, and this guy, who looked homeless, and it is really beat and spit on me. Can you imagine? He spit on me!”

While it may be a shock to the system, some people will say that these interactions have in common.

A cleaning woman who works at the center, told Fox News a homeless woman who comes in every day, cursing at her, and spits on the window.


For the last time, in the case of the citizens being harassed by mentally ill people on the street, has taken a dangerous turn.

Last week, in Austin, to Vincent, a homeless man was caught on camera attacking a 26-year-old woman outside her apartment complex. He threw out Paneez Kosarian, on the ground that he allegedly said about her, and to save it from the robots and is offered the opportunity to kill one of the other women in the neighborhood, in other words, he deserve to be trusted.

Vincent was arrested and pleaded not guilty to a false imprisonment charge and two counts of battery and attempted robbery. In lieu of jail, Superior Court Judge Christine Van Aken, to be released to Vincent, over the objections of the district attorney’s office. Her decision caused a huge backlash in the community, and it was snapped up by the Mayor of London’s Race and other city officials. The court finally ordered Vincent to wear an ankle monitor.

On Monday, He was arrested again for an alleged assault that took place in the month of February. The police said he was armed with a knife walked up to a woman and her friends as they waited for a ride. Vincent has allegedly threatened to kill the woman and then turned to the group.

The subject of Vincent’s new release is just the latest example of that is asking the people of the City by the Bay, and to say that they don’t feel safe on the streets. Upset by the inhabitants of Fox News, said, until the end of June, ” she said, tired of waiting for their elected officials to come up with a plan to complain and no one seems to ever be on the same page.

What is also frustrating is that the city still manages to blow this up by hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars each year to address the crisis, and it is the fault of everyone but themselves, like the homeless count is rising.

“It’s not as if we don’t see the problem,” a former Apple employee, told Fox News. “There is no way to escape.”

“It’s not as if we don’t see the problem. There is no way to escape.”

— A former employee of Apple

In May, officials from the city and fortified themselves, as a preliminary to the homeless count was released. They expect the numbers to rise and they were right. First, the data show that it had jumped to 17 per cent by 2017. The double-digit growth, was bad enough, but then it got to be a whole lot worse.

When the final report was to be released in a couple of months later, it turned out that the street count will increase by 30 percent if the city had stuck to the same definition of homelessness, as they have had in the past. This year, the San Francisco-chosen for the application of the federal definition, in place of the one they wrote themselves.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s definition of homelessness includes people living on the streets, in cars, or in shelters. San Francisco has it’s own definition that widens the category of people without a permanent residence who are in jail, rehab or the hospital. As for the city’s use of the same measurement in the past few years, the figures show an increase from 7,400 to 9,784, or a 30 percent increase in 2019.

A person pushes a cart past a parked Camper vans on a street in San Francisco on June 27, 2019. A federally mandated count of the homeless in San Francisco has increased by 17 per cent in just two years, in part driven by the strong growth of the people in the Camper vans, and other vehicles.
(AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)

City spokesperson Jeff, Sandy explained the change by saying: “San Francisco “to find the DEVICE numbers, as it will help us, in co-operation with other cities such as Los Angeles or the surrounding countries.”

Some of the homeless advocates weren’t on board with that logic is, and has been accused of in the city of how to manipulate the findings to make it seem as though there is progress, when, in fact, the numbers turned out to be the opposite.

The city is also to blame for the rise in homelessness in the big-tech companies that have moved to the area, such as Twitter, Salesforce, NVIDIA, and Eventbrite. They say the companies have brought high paying jobs with them, which has caused the house prices to rise, pushing the people who can’t afford to keep up financially in the neighborhood, or on the street.


Jose is a Bay Area Rapid Transit worker, who has lived in San Francisco for more than 20 years, told Fox News that he fears that he, too, could be homeless on a given day.

“What’s happening now is that they are building too many condos, and the shopping, the people,” he said. “I’ve been lucky that they haven’t kicked me out yet.”

In accordance with a by 2018 the report from the HUD), a family of four children, and lives in San Francisco and making $117,422 in a year is considered “low income.” For singles, a monthly salary of $82,000 or less, then put them in the bracket. In addition, “low-income” for a family of four in New York city is $83,450 per year.

In 2019 a report on the affordability of housing in the San Francisco Bay Area, a Compass, an economist, Patrick Carlisle, said: “affordability rates remain low by historical standards, and the Bay Area usually has one of the lowest in the country.”

According to data from the California Association of Realtors, only 17 per cent of the households are able to afford to buy an average-priced home. In San Francisco, which is $1.7 million.

“There’s no way to buy a home here,” resident Doug Booth, told Fox News. “You’ll have to pay those ridiculous housing prices, the crime, and these people are shitting in the streets. Why would anyone want to stay?”

But to say that it does not attempt to solve the problem, it would be wrong. The. The problem is that the mass is going to be spectacular.

One of the largest statewide lapses, is Proposition 47.

Supported by the California Democratic y, and defended by the American Civil Liberties Union, the referendum was approved by a wide margin in 2014. The idea behind this was to make certain non-violent criminal offenses in order to free up resources for police and prosecutors to go after serious, violent offenders. These included the rolling back of fraud, forgery, shoplifting and grand theft, as long as the total value of the stolen goods was less than $950.

It is also involved in illegal drugs.

“The goal is to be helpful to society, helpful to the homeless problem, it is convenient for the police and the court system. However, as we have seen, it has been a total failure at this point,” Richie Greenberg, a former mayoral candidate, told Fox News.

He added: “The idea was to help them, of course, but what it really wound up doing is that they are all in San Francisco, to make it more attractive to those who are both homeless and people who are addicted to drugs, and to move on from here. We have now found that homelessness is increasing. Drug addiction has increased, and the number of people — the number is likely to increase, as well.”

A man stands outside his tent on Division Street in San Francisco, california.

The city has also been pro-actively involved in the construction of a “surf center.” Billed as a new kind of homeless shelter, the clinics provide homeless San Franciscans the room, and the board of directors, as case managers work to find a new job, signing up for public benefits, and ensure that they receive the health care industry. In contrast to the traditional units, with their partners, pets, and personal possessions are not allowed, they are welcome to the navigation centre. While good in theory, and some warn that there are hidden dangers in the navigation center.

Susan Dyer Reynolds, editor-in-chief of the independent community newspaper the Marina Times, ” says the centers are “not in a sober facilities, and the people stealing and breaking into cars to feed their habits.”

In June, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted 10-1 to make it back to a pilot program that would allow the city to force it on the people who are suffering from a serious mental illness, and drug addiction treatment. This is not a good fit with the liberal democrats, who argued that it would be a breach of civil liberties.


A couple of frustrated residents say it’s time to cut and run.


“The city is running out of strategies,” Barbara Suarez told Fox. “I’m going to move to Austin.”

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular