Robert Müller hearings: 5 big takeaways

in the vicinity ofthe video biggest moments from Robert Mueller’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee,

A look at some of the greatest moments from Robert Mueller’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee.

Former Special Counsel Robert Muller delivered the long-awaited testimonies before two house committees on Wednesday and submitted to almost eight hours of questioning to his summary report on the nearly two-year investigation into the Russian interference in the election in 2016, and related matters.

In his opening statement to the House Judiciary Committee, Mueller democratic and Republican lawmakers warned that his “statement” is necessarily limited,” and that he would not discuss details of the FBI-Russia-investigation, the Steele Dossier, or the actions of the Minister of justice, William Barr.

On numerous occasions, Müller-either the Committee directed members to the report-and said, “I’m not going to discuss it”, “I can’t answer that”, “I’m sure I would take it that the characterization” or “This is outside of my jurisdiction.” He also refused to read from the report itself, and were one-word answers to a series of questions or attempts to clarify, to say “Yes”, “no”, “true” or “correct” in his testimony.

Here are five moments from Muller’s testimony from up-to-date.

1. Muller said the results of its investigation to relieve Trump and said the President can still be prosecuted when he leaves the White house

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-NY, began the question-and-answer period Wednesday morning, asks Mueller whether the results of his investigation of President Trump relieved.

Müller replied: “no.”

The Republicans further to Mueller on why he said the President shall be exempted from liability, which is not spoken on a headline from a CNN report that said: “Miller: Trump was free.”


Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio, said there was no need for Muller to relieve a definitive statement about a contribution exemption to Barr, because the attorney General does not have the authority, the President.

To relieve “when in your report to the attorney-General and Minister of justice have the power, and he does not-he knows that you do not have the power, you don’t have to tell him that she is not exonerating the President. He knows this already. So then that kind of changes the context of the report,” Turner. “The attorney General has to relieve the power to? He was not given the authority.”

“No,” Mueller replied. “We included in the report that for this very reason.”

“You have relieved the power to explain to him to explain as they have the power, him and Anderson Cooper,” Turner said. “The allegation concerning the discharge is misleading and meaningless, and the colors of this investigation. A word from the entire part of your report, and it is a meaningless word that has no legal meaning, and it has colored their entire report.”

“Mr. Miller, would you agree with me that the attorney General have the power to relieve?” Turner more.

“I’m going to pass it on,” said Müller.

“Why?” Turner said.

“Because, it said, embroils us in a legal discussion,” Müller said. “I’m not prepared with a legal discussion in this arena.”


In the afternoon, Trump Müller, attacked the special counsel does not say “the right to discharge,” although the President again and again, with Müller ‘ s report as proof that it relieved him of wrongdoing, shortly after he was released, in April.

When asked by Rep. Kenneth Buck, R-Colo., if Trump can be charged with obstruction of justice after leaving office, Miller replied: “Yes.”

“You could charge the President with a crime after he left office?” Buck asked.

“Yes,” Müller said.

“You believe he committed-you could be free of charge office of the President of the United States, with obstruction of justice after he left?” Buck asked again.

“Yes,” Müller said.

2. Müller, the confusion was not forced to clarify why he accused Trump

Müller confused legislators and the public, when he indicated to the House Judiciary Committee, that if it be not accused for the justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) rule that says a sitting President, while in office, Miller would have someone to prosecute, the President, on the basis of the results of its investigation.

“The reason that you do not accuse the President, because of the OLC opinion, not to a President-in-office, right?” Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., Müller asked.

“Really,” Mueller replied.


The former special counsel’s final statement contradicted the seemingly published a common Declaration of his office and the Ministry of justice of the United States in may, said: “The attorney General has previously declared that the Special Counsel has confirmed repeatedly that he has to say, but for the [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion, he would have the President obstructed justice. The Special Counsel’s report made it clear that the office would not achieve closed it, a determination-one way or the other-about whether the President have committed a criminal offence.”

Rep. Debbie Lesko, R-Ariz., To tell Drill down to the inconsistency, with the prompt, Müller, he is “closer to it would have to consider.”

Müller backpedaled on these comments at the top of its second hearing of the day before the house Intelligence Committee.

“I would like to add a correction to my statement this morning,” Miller said. “I want to go back to a thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said, and I quote, ‘You have impeachment of the President because of the OLC opinion.’ This is not the right way to say it. As we say in the report, and as I a decision whether the President committed a crime, said at the opening, we can’t achieve that.”

3. Müller said that he will meet with Trump for the work of the FBI Director, in contradiction to previous statements of the President

Prior to Miller’s testimony, Trump’s lawyer and his investigations into a series of eight tweets ranted about the former special state.

Among them, Trump said: “It was reported that Robert Mueller says that he apply and interview for the job of FBI Director (and rejected) the day before he was appointed to the wrong Special Counsel. Hope he does not say that you are under oath, that we numerous witnesses to the conversation, including the Vice-President of the United States!”

Trump has repeatedly pointed out, Miller’s alleged interest in the position of FBI Director after the dismissal of James Comey as a potential conflict of interest prevented him from leading the Russian investigation.

Mueller directly contradicted Trump in his testimony and said that he never applied for the job.

Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, asked the Miller about a meeting that he trump the day before he was appointed as a special counsel in may 2017.


Although Müller has confirmed that he met with Trump and discussed the FBI, he said, he did this “not as a candidate,” for the line.

“I was not told of the application for this job,” Miller. “I was told asked for my input, what it would take to do the work,” Miller.

4. Miller said Trump and Donald Jr praise, WikiLeaks was “problematic”

Democratic legislators revisited praised a series of recent tweets, and comments that the President, WikiLeaks published E-Mails stolen from the Democratic National Committee, and Hilary Clinton in the 2016 presidential campaign chairman John Podesta.

Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill., to read Miller asked what he thought of Trump to say, “Boy I love, which WikiLeaks” and the E-Mails, calls a “treasure trove.”


“Well, to be problematic is an understatement in terms of what it displays by some hope or some boost to what is and should be, illegal activities,” Miller said Trump’s comments.

Quigley also asked to elaborate Müller, informed claimed in his report that the WikiLeaks was corresponding with Donald Trump Jr, share incriminating information about Clinton.

“This behavior is at the least worrying,” Quigley Miller said.

“Disturbing and also the subject of the investigation,” Mueller replied.

5. Miller said the Russian election-interference is an ongoing issue that will continue in the year 2020

In his introductory statement before the House Judiciary Committee, Mueller stressed that his investigation “found that the Russian government interfered in our elections in a sweeping and systematic way.”

“In the course of my career, I’ve seen a number of challenges for our democracy,” Miller said later. “The Russian government is trying to interfere with our choice among the most serious.”

Rep. Will Hurd, R-Texas,” asked Mueller during a House Intelligence Committee hearing when he agreed that “Russia’s active measures increases with the frequency and the intensity, including the expanded use of groups such as the [Internet-Research Agency], and these groups pose a significant threat to the United States and our allies in the forthcoming elections.”


Miller said that he agreed and believed that “many more countries are developing the ability to replicate what they have done to the Russians.”

“Did you think that was a single attempt of the Russians to get involved in our election?” Hurd asked. “Or you have to find evidence to suggest that she’s going to try to do this again?”


“There was not a single attempt to do it, as we sit here,” Miller shown a yellow card. “And you expect to do during the next campaign.”

When asked by Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., if he was “concerned that not enough is being done to prevent this from happening again,” Müller replied, “it still needs to be done Much more to protect against these break-ins, not only of Russians, but also of others.”

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular