Reporter’s Notebook: How a Senate study Trump could go

nearvideo house Democrats intensify push for impeachment

Reaction of Matt Bennett, senior vice president and co-founder of Third Way and a former Deputy assistant to President Clinton, and Trent Duffy, a partner at HDMK, and the former Deputy press Secretary to President George W. Bush.

CAPITOL HILL – This is perhaps not as fascinating as the recent debate on the question of whether cereals soup.

But, questions are swirling around the Capitol, as a Senate study can go, should accuse the house of representatives actually President of the Trump.

First of all, the house actually charges the President would have. A single article in the indictment or multiple can. In 1998, the house four articles of impeachment for President Clinton.

The house ultimately Clinton accused on two of the four articles. This article went to the Senate. The house is also track selected “charge Manager”, in the proceedings against Clinton. This “Manager” were members of the house. In fact, three of the impeachment managers in the Clinton impeachment proceedings in the office reps remain today. Steve Chabot, R-Ohio, and Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., together with now-Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S. C. Graham was in the house at the time.


Some insiders have wondered whether Senate majority Leader Mitch McConnell, are trying to conclude a study on the protection of the President could be too short.

On Sept. 24 I asked McConnell if the Senate entertained would indictment should send the house to the Capitol. The Kentucky Republican to my question.

“I’m not going with all these hypotheticals,” McConnell said at the time. “I think it is premature.”

A few hours later, Pelosi is officially the home of the initiation of an impeachment inquiry was announced.

But, during an appearance this week on CNBC, McConnell proposed that the Senate, the attempt would be in the offing.

“I would have no choice but to take it up. How long are you on, it is a whole other question, but I had no other choice than him to a Senate rule on impeachment,” McConnell said.

Most of the leaders referred to a set of 24 rules of the Senate designed a long time ago for impeachment attempts. The Senate currently has 44 rules of procedure for its operations. Such regulations are so sanctified, that it can change a procedural vote with 67 requires-is a standing rule. The Senate, the guidelines for the prosecution are not part of this order, but Fox News was told that it would be adopted require a two-thirds majority of 67 to change the charge. McConnell acknowledged that the point on CNBC. In other words, there is no easy way for the Senate to wiggle out of the consideration of the house impeachment articles.


I already have McConnell for a long time now, and, as I wrote in this space in August, you have to analyze McConnell’s words for acute detail. Over the summer, McConnell said, the Senate would have “discussions” about guns. Naive ears interpreted as an actual debate over firearms. It is now the beginning of October, and the Senate has never been a gun bill on the floor. However, there have been talks”.”



On CNBC, McConnell said that under the Senate rules, “I would have no way to record it.” He also said, “as long as you are on it is quite another thing.”

Therein lies the Problem. Let us explore, what means “recording”, and “how long” the Senate could devote to impeachment.

The Senate impeachment I usually says that, “whenever the Senate the message received from the house of representatives that managers are appointed, on their part to conduct a prosecution against any person directed to carry the indictment to the Senate, the Secretary of the Senate shall inform the house of representatives that the Senate is ready to receive the managers for the purposes of the issuance of such an indictment, comfortable to such a message.”

In other words, the Senate Watcha got to say to the house “?” The “whenever” is important. This means that the Senate is done action automatically.

Senate impeachment rule II says that the “charge Manager”, then the parade will be recognized by the Senate, which will be exhibited to the Senate, and “articles.” Fox News is said, this includes a reading of the indictment in the Senate.

Now, what is happening for the interpretation. At this point, the Senate, as McConnell said, the indictment “taken”. But, as McConnell also said, for “how long?”

This is the reason why history is an important guide. The house has sent the indictment, only on 19 occasions in the history of the Republic. If it is actually impeachment of a President? Well, this can happen only once per century.


McConnell’s office showed reporters this week to a 1986 memo by then-Senate Deputy, Bob Dove, and then-Senate Secretary for the majority, Howard Greene about the impeachment. In the missive, the dove Greene of the Senate, said the indictment sent to President Andrew Johnson, a Committee before his trial in 1868. Dove pointed out that it happens to the rules before the Senate approved his sentence for the prosecution. If the Senate is the route the article to the Committee wanted to, it would probably require a two-thirds vote to overcome the current charge. It is doubtful that the dispatch of the article is done to a Committee, in this instance. But, such a tactic could be found a way to get the items you filling effectively. If it happened, Fox News is told that a Committee would be likely to your own investigation as the house.

But, we don’t have to go to get back to 1868, an impression of this time, what could happen.

In January 1999, then-Senate majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., and Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S. D., introduced a “caucus of the 100 senators” in the Old Senate chamber in the Capitol. In General, senators in separate group sessions, based on party, but Lott and Daschle to forge a General, cross-party compromises and wanted to see how the Senate would treat Clinton’s impeachment proceedings. The senators agreed to hear from the managers and the President to advise and establish the limitations of the time. Even if senators distinction is whether condemned Clinton or relieve him, they agreed, at least on a “trial” operations, and so sit as jurors.

The study would happen… except for one thing.

Legendary Sen., Robert Byrd, D-W. Va., said he wanted to dismiss the charges. Perhaps it is the Senate not be tolerated such a request of any other senator, Robert Byrd, Robert Byrd, perhaps one of the five most influential personalities in the history of the body. Byrd leader was a former majority, a talented speaker, and perhaps most important, the guardian of the Senate’s powers, rules, and precedents.

When Robert Byrd spoke, listened to the people.

In January 1999, Byrd a resolution carried, “that the charges are the proceedings against William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States, and of the same, duly discharged.” But the Senate rejected Byrd’s pleas. The Senate process has continued.

In spite of the rules of procedure of the Senate, and the Senate, the impeachment, regular movements are displayed, subject to the rules of a simple majority in the context of a review. To move so, if there is a current senator were, the indictment, ala Byrd, in 1999, of the Senate, to dismiss, could you flush out the test version with a majority of the votes. This is pretty easy. So, McConnell’s “how long” point.


In this hyper-polarized environment, it is hard to see how McConnell and the Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY, could possibly forge an agreement that has as Lott and Daschle more than two decades ago with a “caucus of 100.” Some Republicans in the Senate dismissed, the article may require. Some Democrats did not come from the implementation of a negotiation. But, currently, there are 53 Republicans in the Senate. A source close to the process told Fox News, “most of the rules of the road” for all interested parties-trial of President Trump.

It is important to note that the Senate before you never ends for impeachment proceedings. And, there are questions, such as whether the Senate could, at the end of such a study against the wishes of the minority. Remember, the minority controls a lot of power in the Senate.

But, it is an instance of the Senate is not actually conducting a study after a house impeachment.

The house of representatives agreed with the charges, U.S. district judge Samuel Kent on June 19, 2009, under the allegation of sexual assault, obstruction and lying to investigators. The house sent the articles to the Senate. But, Kent resigned on June 30, in front of a Senate study. Therefore, the Senate agreed with the indictment of 22.

It needs to condemn a two-thirds majority and a person accused and remove him or her from office. With 53 Senate Republicans, the sell a few analysts thought there would be the possibility that the Senate could vote to trump out of the office. Article I, section 3 of the Constitution says that the Senate would trigger the conviction to stick to a “disqualification and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.” But, the person could still be tried in a court of law.


To take so, if the house impeaches Trump, the Senate had “it” but what happens after the submission of the article is not clear.

After all, this happened only twice. And, usually once per century.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular