Reporter ‘ s Notebook: Capitol Hill expenses, followed by uncertainty

nearvideo house passes spending bill, renewed the Hyde Amdendment

Spending bill includes a ban on Federal money for abortions.

Everyone knew, weeks ago, the New Orleans pelicans would argue Duke-star of Zion Williamson with the first pick in the NBA Draft.

If we only enjoy such clarity on Capitol Hill.

White house chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, Minister of Finance, Steve Mnuchin and the other ventured to the office of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Last week, with the aim of the annual expenditure figures for the next two years, the preventing government shutdowns and raising the debt ceiling.

“We’re close,” said Senate appropriations Committee Chairman Richard Shelby, R-Ala., as he got out of the Conclave. By Contrast, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., evaluated the situation thus: “I think we are apart.”


The different interpretations marked an ominous restart of the negotiations. Note that we said the restart of the negotiations. This is because the talks have been in purgatory for weeks.

Just prior to the confab, a senior source close to the talks expressed confidence.

“We’re going to get it done,” said the source, who is not asked to be identified. “We have to.”

Rand Paul calls hypocrisy in Washington, after the Senate rejects his plan to balance the budget

69 senators vote down Republican sen. Rand Paul’s” penny Plan ” to balance the budget in 5 years and spend average of $11 trillion.

The big concern for the Republicans is on the increase and a failure to cut spending, the military is extremely hard and makes it a challenge to reach an agreement on the spending bills.

“You have to lift the caps. That would be all, what the President is trying to do with the military offer,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S. C.

Congressional leaders and key appropriators huddled together in the middle with Mulvaney, Mnuchin and others. In fact, Senate majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., have been proposed in the pages of an agreement and closing,.


“Our hope is to make a deal before the day is over,” McConnell said last month.

Then, the best signs that things were not going well came. Three hours after a session, the management team back in the Capitol for a matinee round of negotiations. Things like that don’t usually happen in Washington unless the talks are getting somewhere. Another positive sign was that the people were mom. But the day ends with no deal, in spite of McConnell’s optimism.

Everything spilled out in the ditch the following day. The Congress of the Democratic leaders were scheduled to visit the White house with President Barroso at the infrastructure. To have a President Trump and top legislators rails, forged a Pact earlier in the spring. But then trump browbeat Pelosi accused him of a “cover-up” and abruptly, the Council adjourned before it really began.


Admittedly, the infrastructure, the discussions were caps on a separate track of spending, debt-ceiling negotiations. But everything in Washington hinges on the relationships and the political climate. If you are not always together on infrastructure, or the house Democratic investigations of the Trump Administration, it is doubtful that they can pivot in a miraculous way, sing “Kumbaya” and produce a fiscal compact on the expenditure and debt brake.

So, no, you met again until last week. And the only thing that could be, it was agreed that all parties were not in agreement.

Pelosi on Trump: If the goods are there, you need to charges

Pelosi dismisses blames trombone; Fox News contributor Dan Bongino, and ‘The Five’ co-host Juan Williams react to the ‘history.’

“In the spirit of cooperation, our first priority is the raising of the debt ceiling,” said Mnuchin outside the Speaker’s Office in the past week. “We are all agreed, we would not be subject to the debt limit to spend.”

In addition to Mnuchin, Mulvaney explains that the management of a victory in the session: an amendment to Pelosi, the position on the sequencing of the talks.


Pelosi before suggested, a week-and-a-half, that agreement caps to raise mandatory spending, known as sequestration, was their first demand.

“If we lift the cap, then we can limit talk about the lifting of the debt ceiling. But that would be only a second or simultaneous. But not before lifting the caps,” Pelosi said.

The speaker has a Problem with Mulvaney’s representations.

“We have time for Mick Mulvaney characterization of my comments?”, replied an excited Pelosi. “Mulvaney is one of the people who shut down the government because they do not want to raise the ceiling on the debt. And so he has to delete any credibility on the subject.”

Mick Mulvaney on bipartisan pushback-President of the Trump the threat of new tariffs on goods from Mexico

President Donald Trump says he will have duties to impose on all goods from Mexico, until the country stops the flow of undocumented migrants from Central America who cross its territory and enter the United States; to the knowledge of the acting chief of staff of the White house Mick Mulvaney.

This combines two topics. As a Republican Congressman from South Carolina, Mulvaney against some invoices, for the financing of the government. He voted against a big pack in the year 2011, the debt ceiling, and create the caps is very expenditure, the negotiators are now trying to terminate. The latter package had anything open to do with the attitude of the government.

Mulvaney remains in the focus of the talks. But Pelosi is not the only democratic leader who has reservations about the President’s Acting Chief of Staff.

“I think Mulvaney does not want a deal. I think this is the biggest problem,” said House majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md.


“A high-level source familiar with the talks told Fox that Mulvaney “p—ed everyone off” during last week’s meeting. Some of the democratic negotiators, said Mnuchin, you instead would rather be with him, and he asked them to leave, Mulvaney back in the White house.

However, if it caps there is no agreement about the expenditure, the management of a year-long Continuing resolution, or CR, to Fund the government. By its nature, the CRs simply current promotions renew at existing levels. It also has a a-year limit suspension of the debt ceiling. Democrats against the proposal.

After the meeting in the Speaker’s Office, Mulvaney Democrats accused of blackmail trying to get extra money for non-military programs. The military figure dwarves are always the non-defense, as the Pentagon gets more than half of all discretionary dollars allocated by Congress these days. President Trump demands $750 billion for the military. Democrats are not loads against rising defense – if you secure a significant increase for everything else.

“Everyone is trying to lift the caps,” said Mulvaney.

Anti-government waste group makes billion-pork-barrel-spending

The Congress 2019 pig book identifies the most egregious examples of pork-barrel spending in Congress, which is drawn from the financial year 2019 appropriations bills.

After the meeting on Capitol Hill, Mulvaney argued that the Democrats wanted $639 billion on non-military programs. Now it is $647 billion.

“So tell me, if things are moving in the right direction,” said Mulvaney.

The democratic number grew. But Democrats were to increase the agility, the size of the non-defense cake in the budget resolution the house “as” approved earlier this year. The additional $8 billion for the census and for IRS enforcement. House Budget Committee Chairman John Yarmuth, D-Ky., is announced the hike in a letter to Pelosi last week.

Hoyer pointed out that Democrats were willing, a Republican, to $733 billion for the defense and suggested that Mulvaney and other Republicans were still tens of billions of additional dollars for a special defense Fund: “Overseas Contingency Operations or OCO spending.” OCO-is real money that goes to the Pentagon. But it is not the caps against the spending.


“This is a fiscally totally irresponsible and a game,” said Hoyer. “[Mulvaney] want to maximum pressure, the expenditures in the September to squeeze down as hard as he can to non-defense discretionary.”

The lack of progress in the negotiations is a problem. A failure to lift the debt ceiling this summer, sparks could be a market shock. Legislators are still crisp, which struggled in 2011 as Congress and the Obama administration to lift the debt.

When asked what the administration wants to be able to get increase in a debt ceiling, White House Director of Legislative Affairs Eric Ueland said: “as long as we have. As soon as we can get.”

House Democrats refuse Pentagon funds for boundary wall

The reaction and the analysis of Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert on ‘Fox & friends First.’

But the hour grows late. In fact, some argue that the window for the caps agreement is completely closed. The debt brake Problem could prove so all-consuming that there is no bandwidth for a caps package. It is a hurry to make a deal, before the Senate began writing his annual costs of the measures. Senate Republicans view of the four appropriations bills approved by the house last week, and the batch is on tap for this week – as a “messaging” bills. You are not going anywhere. No Republicans voted for the appropriations measure last week.

A source said, Fox pro, page is now just trying to decide where the other one is ready to land.

The Republicans are suspicious of another government shutdown. She is afraid that the last winter, voters believe the 35-days-distance-left-Trump can’t govern. Another shutdown could be devastating. One thing is for sure: another government shutdown would be the last appearance of the choir practice. That’s why GOPers are pushing a government one-year financing package. It is the lesser of two evils.


The disadvantage is that a CR would only spend $716 billion on defense. Surprisingly, GOP sources say, the President seems to be in order. A source said that with no defense Minister, there is no one in the White house for the Pentagon. So, the defense could falter. Democrats against the one-year CR. You can, however, also rather a lesser of two evils. That would mean holding the line on defense spending – even if you have no lock-in increases elsewhere.

So all of this is now stalled. It is amazing to think that McConnell thought, the pages of this until weeks could wrap. Therefore, the only uncertainty is certain in Washington.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular