Protests break out after the DNC puts kibosh on climate change-focused discussion

nearvideo Republican blasts ‘unapologetic hypocrisy” of the climate change alarmists

Rep. Thomas Massie, calls from Hollywood and the liberals on climate change.

The Democratic National Committee’s summer meeting in San Francisco, broke into a hail of protests on Thursday, as the recalcitrant environmentalists, activists, the party has condemned the decision not to hold a presidential primary debate, which focuses exclusively on climate change — a claim for a long time of left-wing activists.

The San Francisco Bay Area Chapter of the environmentalist group, Sunrise movement, posted a video of dozens of its members singing the union anthem “Which side Are you On?”, after the DNC-s-not resolutions-Committee voted 17-8 to, a climate-focused discussion.

Some boisterous protesters fought seemingly to remember more than the song-the chorus, as others chanted “they say in Harlan County there are no neutrals there. You are a man with either a trade Union. Or a thug for J. H. Blair.”

“That’s terrible, scary, existential crisis requires a different approach,” said Muriel MacDonald, an organizer for the Sunrise-the movement in the Bay Area. “If we play by the old rules, we suffer terribly.”


After the group rushed out, Symone Sanders, senior Advisor of presidential candidate Joe Biden, wrote on Twitter that a Central point of contention was the question of whether a climate change debate, in contrast to a less confrontational climate-change forum.

“I said, what we do, say people who have also asked for the debates and said no, and the forums had to have?” Sanders wrote. “I called checked women’s repro-groups, black women, Latinx, BLM, and more.”

Sanders rejected a claim of the sunrise movement, he was “trying to shut down the movement for a #climate debate part of the drive to the meeting. But your boss [Joe Biden] has publicly several times supported him. So…what’s going on?”


In the midst of all the infighting, with a DNC official, speaking to the protesters, suggested that some compromise remained possible.

Sunrise Bay Area quoted separately, a DNC member with the words: “you have friends there, and we go to a floor vote in the #climate debate resolution…we do not give up. It’s the people fighting here. We have your back.”


DNC Chairman Tom Perez has, hanging from his earlier decision not to keep the “single issue” debates, instead of planning at least a dozen debates, six in the year 2019, and at least six in the year 2020, in partnership with TV networks. The third of the series is Sept. 12 and, potentially, Sept. 13 if enough candidates to qualify.

Perez has claimed he wants to see the widest audience possible, that democratic candidates will discuss a broad range of topics. His aides also note that the party has received separate applications for single-issue debates about civil rights, weapons, poverty and issues that impact on older Americans.

In addition, the party has excluded its candidate, the participation in non-DNC debate, the Chairman sponsored how candidates interact on the same stage at the same time.

But the party is assumed to have the resolution Committee, on Thursday, a statement that the candidate is encouraged to participate in informal “multi-candidate” forums with the candidates on the same stage. It could, however, meet Perez’s definition of a “debate”, and thus they result in conflict with existing provisions, apart from the candidate of such events not sanctioned by the party.

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, the second on the right, refers to the amount prior to the signing of the climate protection legislation in Seattle at 7. May 2019. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, file)

In a statement, sunrise-movement of the day called a “partial victory for the young climate organizers nationwide”, because “after months of campaign advertising,” the resolution Committee, Vice versa, a ban on the presidential candidates participating side-by-side in a “not-DNC sanctioned events to discuss the climate crisis.”


But activists have long sought an official DNC-sanctioned climate change debate. In an embarrassing blunder, dozens of Sunrise movement protesters recently a sit-in protest against what they believed to require the Pennsylvania democratic party, office lobby, to organize the party, to cause such a debate is staged.

Police arrested 11 people, and it later turned out, it was not a democratic party office. The environmentalists said that they had received bad information.

“If you can’t figure out where the local Democratic party offices before you show up for the protest, I’m not sure I trust their analysis of the climate-science said much less what you actually do about the problem,” Ted Nordhaus, co-founder and Director of the breakthrough Institute, told Reuters.

Yet, in spite of all the setbacks, on Thursday, the group, a note of optimism, listened to, and vowed to continue working for this goal.

“This victory shows the strength of the grassroots movement and the power of young people,” said Sunrise spokesman for the movement Sofie Karasek. “In the coming days and months, we will continue to fight to ensure that the DNC, and Tom Perez to treat the climate crisis as the emergency that it is, and then specify the transmission time and attention it deserves.”

However, policy seemed to be against the wind, running against the environmental activists. In the confusion 2020 presidential came a day after Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, climate change, the center theme of his campaign, announced he was “retreating” from the year races, as the Democrat said: “it is clear”, he wanted to you don’t have a Chance at winning the primary.

The environmental activist, had called on the DNC host a debate centered solely on the climate change — only to meet not worthy of polling, threshold values need to attend the party the next regularly scheduled debate in Houston, as well as a CNN town hall in New York dedicated to global warming.

“People will try to spin it differently, but Inslee is the lackluster performance obviously bearish indicator for the prioritization of climate change in the Democratic policy,” analyst Nate Silver’s aid Wednesday.

“Inslee, could not improve on ~1% in the polls, despite a strong focus on climate change, is a data point against the theory that the Democrats are” the voices are deeply motivated by the concern,” he added.

Swedish climate-activist Greta Thunberg, front with white cap, takes part in a protest rally in Hamburg, Germany, on 1. March 2019. (Daniel Reinhardt/dpa via AP, file)

At the same time, democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders a $published 16.3 trillion climate plan earlier this month, the expanded the Green New Deal. Sanders pushed for renewable energy across the economy by 2050, and sought an official Declaration that climate change represents a national emergency.

Sanders has described the plan as a “ten-year country-wide mobilization centered on the equity and humanity.”

For his part, President Trump has said, the Green New Deal would “crush the poor.” The environment Agency Trump said last month, clean up the success seen by tags, and work on more practical solutions, for example, through the issue of more “Superfund” grants to the polluted sites.

A United Nations report on climate change, warned late last year that the world will face several consequences of climate change, extreme drought, food shortages and deadly floods – unless there is an “unprecedented” efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.


Then, last November, the trump administration, a federal report published, the found that the effects of climate change are felt across the country, and “extreme weather and climate events” are going to worsen in the coming years, with a significant potential impact on the economy by the end of the century.

Some conservative commentators have argued that most of the proposed solutions will do more harm than good, and also accused climate activists have to sacrifice their credibility by crying wolf. In 2006, a NASA scientist and the leading global warming researchers explained that the world has just 10 years to avert a climate catastrophe — a deadline that came and gone in that time.

Fox News’ Andrew O ‘ Reilly and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular