nearvideo Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders call to a national emergency on climate change
The former trump-EPA official Mandy Gunasekara, says Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, and Sen. Sanders manufacture a climate crisis to divert attention from the positive things that the trump administration is doing.
The reach of the “Green New Deal” (GND) the aim of drastic reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 is virtually impossible, according to an analysis using the government’s own economic modelling.
The Heritage Foundation is trying to use the Energy Information Administration’s National Energy model to forecast the effects of steep carbon taxes, aimed at the achievement of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions goal, supported by Republic of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-NY, house Democrats, and a variety of 2020 presidential candidate.
Not only that, the model crashes, it fails to approach, somewhere in the vicinity of the target, in the “GND.” The next heir was able to get was a 58-percent reduction in emissions achieved by a $300 carbon tax, — tax on $300 crashed the EIA model.
“The carbon tax above US $ 300 (which is slightly over 50 percent CO2 reduction by 2050) the model to crash, and thus 58 per cent reduction in CO2 emissions compared to the 2010 level is the largest level, we are able to model,” the authors of the study, Nicolas D. Loris, and Kevin D. Dayaratna, wrote in the study, which was published on Wednesday.
AOC TOP AIDES GREEN NEW DEAL OF ECONOMIC CONFESSES, CLIMATE
Only 58 percent would, by 2040, costing the economy $15 trillion in lost gross domestic product and an average of 1.1 million jobs per year. The average family of four would also be a total income loss of $165,000, or almost $ 8,000 per year.
Household expenditure on energy would also, with an average increase of 30 percent. Worse is that the rate of emissions reduction slowed considerably as the heir to gradually raise tax on carbon emissions in their modeling — that indicates that the Democrats will control the increasing difficulties in reducing emissions, which reached a higher concentration.
The study came at a time when the Democratic presidential candidate, has sounded the alarm on climate change and supports Ocasio-Cortez ambitious — yet controversial — vision for the prevention of the supposed disasters.
In their resolution for the “mass,” Ocasio-Cortez pointed to a report by the United Nations, which determined that global warming is at or above 2 degrees Celsius would lead to a lot of bad results. The migration of peoples, a loss of more than 99% of the earth’s coral reefs, raging forest fires, and more than $500 billion in lost annual economic output for the United States only
TRUMP SAYS GREEN NEW DEAL WOULD ADVERTISES ‘CRUSH’ POOR AMERICANS, THE ENVIRONMENTAL BALANCE SHEET
It is unclear, however, how to stop much of the “GND” in the location of those, the catastrophic consequences would be. Through a model that the U. N. has used heritage found that a 100-percent cut in emissions would only “have a negligible influence on global warming.”
For Heritage-analysis, it is assumed, emission reductions would be double-applied as effectively as the former, President Obama’s Interagency Working Group, change the climate. Yet and still, “the world is just less than 0.2 degrees Celsius cooler would be up to the year 2100, and sea level rise would be slowed to less than 2 centimeters.”
The emissions is only one aspect of the “GND” to guarantee the also pretends to be “high-quality health care,” affordable housing, and the “economic security”. An analysis of the right-leaning integrated American Action Forum (AAF), other aspects of the plan, and determined that it could cost as much as $94 trillion US dollars. Like heritage, though, the AAF also said that the entirety of the “GND’s” cost was impossible to quantify and is likely to be higher than the estimate reached.
Because it is unclear how exactly Ocasio-Cortez the implementation of the emissions goal, the intention, the economic costs could vary significantly. And according to the Heritage authors, their estimates pale in comparison to the trust costs.
SANDERS COMPARES CLIMATE CHANGE TO PUSH TO PEARL HARBOR ANSWER, AS HE UNVEILED AN EMERGENCY RESOLUTION
Ocasio-Cortez ‘s office has not responded to Fox News’ request regarding the implementation.
“Our calculations do not constitute a significant underestimation of the true cost of the Green New Deal, such as the carbon tax and regulations read completely the achievement of the policy objectives, in the non-binding resolution,” the study said.
“In addition, the analysis is not a cost account for the direct taxpayer, as the lawyers want to pay for the Green New Deal by a massive stimulus-style package. Layers of additional regulations and mandates, such as the proposal’s objective is to maximize the energy efficiency for each new and existing buildings in the United States, would the cost even higher.”
According to a fact sheet and quickly removed to be published by Ocasio-Cortez ‘ s office, the “GND” would be only “a tiny part” of the achievement of emission reductions. “We can’t just tax the gas and expect the workers to figure out a different way to work, unless we have a better, more affordable option,” the fact sheet read.
GREEN NEW DEAL ARCHITECT SAYS, CLIMATE CHANGE MAY LEAD TO ’25 HOLOCAUST’
Also claimed that “cap-and-trade”, a policy scheme floated by the former President, Obama, would be only a “tiny part of the larger Green New Deal plan.”
In spite of its support in 2020 candidates, the “GND” face grim political prospects. Not only is the Senate is dominated by Republicans, but the majority of the Ocasio-Cortez colleagues in the chamber also voted against bringing the resolution to a floor vote.
It is also in the face of intense criticism of President Trump is almost guaranteed a veto — and the Republicans in both chambers of Congress. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called the “grim Reaper” of socialism, an apparent response to the proposals, such as the “GND.”
In the house, the Republican Study Committee, a resolution declared, to establish the proposal “thinly veiled” attempts urged, in a socialist society against the nation’s core principles of dignity.
Ocasio-Cortez dismissed the critics as overly pessimistic, what is the “GND’s” pricetag, compared to you, “Dr. Evil”, the ridiculous, outrageous ransom demands in the “Austin Powers” movie.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
In a video tells of the future, Ocasio-Cortez is a self-portrait, and your climate plan as a success, despite the naysayers’ objections.
“A lot of people, she said, we were doomed,” she said, after the guilt of fossil-fuel companies like Exxon for saddling the public with the costs of climate protection. “But some of us are reminded that, as a nation, we are already in danger before the Great Depression, the second world war — that we know from our history, as you pull together to fight an almost overpowering enemy.”