News

Nadler repeated erroneous statement corrected, Müller, about why Trump was not charged

nearvideo house Democrats file a court petition for Mueller grand jury material for further investigation Trump

According to Robert Mueller’s testimony on Capitol Hill, House Judiciary Committee Chair Rep. Jerry Nadler, a new effort announced to investigate compelling evidence of the President’s misconduct.’

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler repeatedly a fault claim on Friday – this was corrected by former Special Counsel Robert Mueller during his testimony earlier this week about why President Trump was not charged in the Russia probe.

During a Democratic press conference on müller’s statement, Nadler, a New York Democrat, claims, Mueller said, the only reason why Trump was not indicted for obstruction of justice was because of a justice Department opinion, the prohibition of charging a sitting President with a crime. He cited Müller the answer to a question from the House Judiciary Committee member Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif.

MUELLER, TOPICS ENLIGHTENMENT, TAKES BACK THE BOMB STATEMENT ABOUT TRUMP INFORMED

“He told us, in a remarkable exchange with Mr Instead of notice, to do but for the Department of Justice policy to ban [him], this, he would have said President Trump,” Nadler charged. “In fact, it is clear that any other citizen of this country, has behaved to be paid as this President has, would be with several crimes.”

But on Wednesday, the Miller even went out of his way to clarify that he recommended intending to.

Video

DEMS LAUNCH “IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION” WITH THE AWARD OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE GRAND JURY INFO, THERE ARE MUELLER DELIVERED

“I would like to add a correction to my statement this morning,” Mueller told the House Intelligence Committee, after the hearing before the legal Affairs Committee earlier Wednesday. “I want to go back to a thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said, and I quote, ‘You have impeachment of the President because of the OLC opinion.’ This is not the right way to say it. As we say in the report, and as I a decision whether the President committed a crime, said at the opening, we can’t achieve that.”

Earlier in the day, Democrats, thought Müller delivered a bomb during his conversation with Ted Lieu. “The reason that you do not accuse the President, because of the OLC opinion, not to a President-in-office, right?” Instead of Müller asked. He replied: “Correct.”

But to decide Müller, the convey in his clarification, was that the OLC opinion did not prevent him, even if criminal charges would be warranted in the first place.

There was great interest in the role of the OLC policy was not included in Mueller’s decision not to bring charges.

In March, a summary of the Mueller report – before an unredacted version was published, attorney General Bill Barr, he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein conclusion that there is not enough evidence to determine that Trump committed obstruction of justice, punishable by law said. Barr said that the determination was made without regard to the OLC opinion.

Barr also told reporters that he had met with the special Council on the report and “Müller does not mention three times to tell us at this meeting in response to our questioning, that he was emphatically, but for the OLC opinion, he had constipation.”

But in may, Miller delivered a public statement about its probe and said, “charging the President with a crime was not an option we could consider,” raising questions about whether he would trump accused, if not for the opinion.

This prompted a round of clarification of the statements of both the Ministry of justice and the Müller-team, said Barr and Miller do not contradict each other.

“The attorney General has previously declared that the Special Counsel has confirmed repeatedly that he has to say, but for the OLC opinion, he would have the President obstructed justice,” read the joint statement by DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec and Müller, spokesman Peter Carr of the time. “The special counsel’s report and his testimony made clear that the office would not achieve closed it, a determination – one way or the other – about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements.”

Fox News’ Ronn Blitzer contributed to this report.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular