McConnell condemns ‘modern McCarthyism,’ ‘weak’ Obama policy, according to experts call it the “Russian asset’

nearvideo Senate majority Leader Mitch McConnell is defending itself against criticism, block choice security bills

To speak in the Senate to Mitch McConnell vows not to be intimidated by liars and tyrants.

In unusually forceful, angry, and personal conditions, Senate majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Monday countered what he was intimidated as the “unfounded smears” of the left media, and not “swore” that in the Wake of a Washington Post op-ed, the said McConnell, “Russian capital.”

The op-ed was written by columnist Dana Milbank, which was McConnell suggested bluntly, one of several “Hyper hacks” that were conveniently ignored, former President Obama’s “feckless” Russia and vent policy.

Milbank had argued that McConnell against a number of choice-security bills proposed by the Democrats effectively made him an unsuspecting Russian agent and other experts, quickly echoed Milbank’s argument. On MSNBC the “Morning Joe” on Friday, host Joe Scarborough, you say repeatedly McConnell “Moscow” Mitch,”,”, he aid, “the Russian President Vladimir Putin was Hiking” the efforts to “under” American elections — and even claimed a Russia-associated with investments in Kentucky could play a role.

“I didn’t normally take the time to respond to the critics in the media, if you have no idea what you’re talking about,” said McConnell. “But this modern McCarthyism is toxic and harmful, because of the way it distorts our entire public discourse.


“The facts in question,” McConnell said in a strict tone. “The Details matter. History matters, and if our nation is losing our ability to debate public policies without shouting about treason, this is very important. In the middle of the 20th century, the original McCarthyism America has violated the force and reduced the position in the Cold war by dividing us against ourselves.”


In response, Fred Hiatt, editorial page editor at The Washington Post, told Fox News: “Dana Milbank column was a legitimate exercise in the commentary, makes the argument that sen McConnell is the blocking of elections-safety is the the United States harm and work to Russia’s advantage. Of course, it is equally legitimate to speak that Mr McConnell a contrary opinion, but the Milbank argument has nothing to do with McCarthyism has.”

McConnell, however, said the “outrage industrial complex” had ignored his legitimate and principled objections to Democrats ” proposed election-security bills. For example, McConnell noted that the New York Times editorial wrote the board this weekend, that he “long opposed Federal involvement in elections management,” and as far back as 2002, “repeatedly spoke out against a one-size-fits-all” approach in favour of a choice left up to the States.”

One of the Democrats ” would the proposals by the Federal government to order the use of paper ballots and voting machines that do not connect directly to the Internet, and included funds for the federal Election Assistance Commission.

It is the house 225-184 went, with only one Republican vote, and handed over to McConnell, then the Democrats ” killed offer it in the Senate via unanimous consent. McConnell chastised Democrats for “partisan” maneuver, namely, the bill had no realistic chance of passing by unanimous consent, which can be blocked, a senator.

Republicans have said that Democrats are playing politics by seeking election security funding that was already allocated for this purpose. Last year, the Republicans $allocated 380 million to the States for the choice of safety in a funding bill, although the move only little attention. States have to grant you money to spend that allocation.

First Amendment concerns also have been raised about a different law, the request proposed by the Democrats, campaigns for the disclosure of all contacts with external persons of the FBI. Also this would be an unprecedented Federal overreach into state-level elections, McConnell said.


Nevertheless, he made it clear that he did not believe Democrats actually about his reasoning.

“This modern McCarthyism was said to be pushed by the major outlets,” McConnell. “The smear that I am” a Russian well, ” ran in the opinion pages of the Washington Post. The accusation that I am ‘un-American’ was broadcast on MSNBC. This is the state of leftist politics in 2019.”

He added: “These people have worn, the volume buttons are so bad, that you smear, nothing more, but the most unhinged,” McConnell said. “Welcome to the modern McCarthyism. McCarthy-like tactics to see out in the open for all.”

According to McConnell, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY, indicated that he was confused by the Republican ” opposition to the bills.

“I don’t have a really good idea why the leader won McConnell ‘T do something about election security,” Schumer said. He added that it would be a “mistake to be that” a “partisan warrior”, the director of national intelligence (DNI), in a page, Rep., John Ratcliffe blow to Texas to replace the trump name outgoing DNI Dan Coats.

Schumer said that if the administration officials, the President of the information that he does not want to hear, “you’re either dismissed, or they are frozen and stop you.”

But McConnell, who is in the Senate in 1985, said he was staunchly loyal to the United States and deeply skeptical of the Soviet Union and later from Russia.

“I am proud of my testimony, I am proud of the fact that it is right there in black and white, and a liar is not the way of gaslight there,” McConnell said.


The majority leader noted that in the 1980s, he stood with then-President Ronald Reagan on missile defense and its Soviet policy. He also said he was “honoured” to crumble to watch “communism” before and later “alarm” when then-President Bill Clinton was “soft on Russia.”

Trump seems to joke with Putin about the choice to manipulate, fake news

Trump meets with the Russian President at the G20 summit; chief White House correspondent John Roberts reports.

“I have the hearings to grill Democratic officials said that the President [Boris] Yeltsin and optimistic President Putin,” McConnell, noting that many Democrats were less skeptical of Putin.

“And, of course, I have the charge lead half against the Obama administration completely weak Russia policy. President Obama mocked in 2012, his opponent for the admission of Russia to take seriously. His government was looking for a naive reset with the Kremlin, and for eight years I contributed to the indictment of weakness.

“In 2010 I stood with [Arizona GOP Sens.] John McCain and John Kyl, to the new START Treaty, a watered-down place-holder for the kind of tough attitude that we deemed as necessary,” McConnell added. “As Vladimir Putin was to undertake for the development of its nuclear Arsenal, we even had to push-President Obama to deploy capable missile defense for Europe.”


“In 2012, I am set to return to authorise legislation with severe sanctions after the murder of Sergei Magnitsky in a Russian prison. The Obama administration flinched and tried to tiptoe to prevent our legislative mess up their charm offensive, but we are backed into a corner, and the President, under the bill signed into law.”

McConnell concluded: “Let me glass ventilate clear for the Hyper the hacks, the not followed nor, in fact, this is the question. Every single member of the Senate agrees that Russia is the interference was real and is real. We all agree that the Federal government, state government and the private sector have to take on all the obligations this threat seriously and strengthen our defenses. Claims to the contrary -that no one here denies what the Russians have on President Obama’s watch-just lies, not partisan distortion, not clever spin, a total of only inventions.”

Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee, published the first volume of his long-awaited report into the Russian electoral interference efforts, the new details of how the Russian government hackers “directed wide-ranging activities against the US electoral infrastructure” – and may have security vulnerabilities, you can take advantage of the upcoming elections.


However, the Committee said that an important purpose of the participation of Russia may have been the cause of the hysteria and America, the confidence in the democracy. In fact, the panel said Russia wanted to be discovered by their activities.

“While the Committee does not know with confidence what were Moscow’s intentions, Russia has been probing weaknesses in the coordination of the systems for later use,” the report stated. “Alternatively, Moscow might have tried to undermine confidence in the US elections of 2016, simply due to the discovery of their activities.”

Fox News’ Brian Flood contributed to this report.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular