Lawmakers clash over the Ukraine of witness as a trump GOP says closing repetitions of ‘it’

in the vicinityVideoVindman pressed on what part of the Ukraine call it, showed the “demand” for the investigation into political rivals

New details emerge, the reports on Army Lt. Col. Alexander he received his closed-door testimony to the House Intelligence Committee; Catherine Herridge.

This week on the spree of closed-door interviews with witnesses as part of the trump indictment trial a political war over the house Democrats, ” in dealing with the process, with the help of the Republicans accused their colleagues of the tip of the scale during these sessions the rules even as Speaker Nancy Pelosi tried to clarify, for the investigation has fueled forward.

Tensions spilled over Tuesday after the interrogation of Army Lt. Col. Alexander he received his who testified that he had concerns about President Trump the July-phone call with Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky. A source familiar with the deposition said on Fox News, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., blocked several lines of questioning, questions, raising objections “, came within six degrees of the whistleblower”, which is referred to originally, that the call in a complaint to watchdog on the intelligence community.


When he received his was asked, whom does he have details of the July shared said 25 call with the source, the ship the survey to, said: “We are not to go there.”

The complaints were also from GOP leaders, who accused the ship blocking their lines of questioning. Rep. Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, accused the ship of the coaching he received his.

“I mean, they are bad on most of these statements, but to interrupt it, you choose us again and again to the coach, the witness to … what are we in the position to ask questions to the witnesses,” he said on “Hannity.”

According to his written opening statement, he received his said he knows the identity of the whistleblower. GOP Rep. Jim Jordan, though, rejected claims by Democrats that they are trying to find out who the whisteblower during this survey.

“We are trying to find out who is on our witness list!”, he said. Refers to a democratically-drafted resolution establishing the guidelines for the impeachment hearings, he said: “There are witnesses to be called. We would like to find out who these witnesses are.”

President Trump, meanwhile, called on fellow Republicans to “close it!”

“The Republicans have been very consistent and energized in our battle on the charges of fraud with the Do Nothing Democrats, and now go to start, according to the substance, the even more than the very infair [sic] process, since only a cursory reading of the Transcript that EVERYONE can see that the conversation with the Ukrainian President was completely right,” Trump tweeted. “… This impeachment nonsense is just a continuation of the witch hunt is a hoax, I have chosen since before even. Rupublicans [sic], go with substance, and close it out!”

Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., also accused of the vessel and speaker Pelosi in the execution of a “Soviet-style process,” denied “due process” to the Republicans and the White house.

Ship, on the other hand, dismissed the Republicans ‘ complaints about the process, said on Monday that almost 50 Republicans in the deposits, despite their allegations that the members of shutting out.


“The Republicans can spuriously attack the process,” he tweeted. “While we put the truth.”

The clash-points are treated to increasingly violent tensions over the way the impeachment hearings by the house Democrats. It flows into the larger complaints by the Republicans, the Democrats are on the Ukraine call as a pretext for a pre-determined charge of the probe.

But to damage the prosecution probe witness testimony to offer, including the statement of last week that the administration start, in fact, in connection to U.S. military aid for the push for Ukraine to be the sought-after studies.

More clashes Wednesday could come during the closed-door questioning of the State Department’s Christopher Anderson and Caroline Croft.

Especially the role of is observed, the Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani played in the implementation of its own investigation, the Biden family, the activities in the Ukraine, and how this may impact on the administration policy.

After prepared remarks, Anderson is saying that the former National security adviser John Bolton warned him, and the former US envoy to the Ukraine, Kurt Volker, that Giuliani was a Central voice with the trombone on the Ukraine and “could commitment is an obstacle for a higher White house.”

This testimony will take place a day before a planned vote on the resolution of the impeachment inquiry process.

The heart of the probe’s call of July, where Trump called Zelensky “look into” the behavior of the former Vice-President Joe Biden’s (and Biden’s son, Hunter) in relation to Ukraine, as well as in the country’s activities in the election in 2016. Trump has the call called “perfect” and claimed that there is no quid was bound pro quo for military aid.


He received his expressed concerns about the investigation in his interview Tuesday, but was also the issue of his statement that it is not “demand the right to a foreign government, the investigation of a U.S. citizen.”

A source told Fox News that he received his fought for several minutes when she asked, point-to-Trump ‘ s language in the transcript, the assertion that there is a need backed up. He received his later found that Trump was in the party with the most power, or “superior”, so the “whole of [the call] was a request, asking for a favor.”

The transcript of the conversation shows Trump Zelensky asked to “do us a favor do” and “on the ground” in the Ukraine, the activities in 2016, and “look into” the three-piece’ activity as well.

After prepared remarks, he received his investigators said he went to his leadership, because he believed the call was correct. The source said, he received his described the call as “wrong”, but when pressed, he received his said that he was not a lawyer and claimed that it was a crime.



He received his said he was concerned “about the impact on national security, U.S. relations, and the loss of the cross-party support for Ukraine.” The source said that he received his testimony suggested there were “political differences, not a legal issue.”

Fox News ‘ Catherine Herridge, Mike Emanuel and Ronn Blitzer contributed to this report.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular