nearvideo trump rips new Kavanaugh claim
The book claims that second exposure with the incident in the party.
Top 2020 Democratic candidate Kamala Harris and Julian Castro announced on Sunday that the Supreme court, Brett Kavanaugh “needs to be indicted,” according to a new, unsubstantiated and disputed allegations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh appeared in a New York Times piece.
The revived, longshot push to get Kavanaugh comes away from the high court, as Democrats are trying to accuse President Trump have come largely to a halt. Trump, for his part, proposed that Kavanaugh should sue for defamation.
The Times piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, adapted from their forthcoming book, argues that Kavanaugh’s classmates from the Clinton-connected non-profit CEO, Max Stier, “saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down to another drunken dorm party, where friends, pushed his penis in the hand of a student.”
‘PART OF WHAT MOTIVATED’ CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD OF THE POLITICAL’, THE ASTERISK WAS ON KAVANAUGH, A LAWYER CONFESSES
According to the times, the bull “designated senators, and the FBI is aware of this account, but the FBI does not investigate, and Mr. bull has refused to discuss publicly.”
But not to mention the times “article, what is striking is that Pogrebin and Kelly’s book also found that the student refuses to question any knowledge of the alleged consequence.
“The book notes, silently, that the woman Max Taurus was named, allegedly, victims of Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event,” notes The Federalist, the Mollie Hemingway. “Seems not, I know, significant.”
“The omission of these facts from the @nytimes story is one of the worst cases of journalistic malpractice that I can remember,” wrote the “National Review,” the Washington correspondent, John McCormack on Twitter.
The times went on to note in the article that he had “confirmed that the story with the two officials who communicated with Mr. bull,” but the article clearly only meant that the times had confirmed the bull of his request to the FBI. No first-hand report of the alleged episode, which was apparently won.
Nevertheless, Democrats announced a new effort to overthrow Kavanaugh. Impeachment Kavanaugh would remove a majority in the Democratically-controlled house, and it is highly unlikely that two-thirds of the votes in the GOP-majority Senate would then be required to him by the Bank.
“I was by those hearings,” Harris wrote on Twitter. “Brett Kavanaugh’s song of the U.S. Senate and, above all, for the American people. He was on the court through a mock process and its place in the Hof is an insult to the pursuit of truth and justice. He needs to be indicted.”
NEW YORK TIMES DELETES TWEET CALLING a PENIS Bump ‘HARMLESS fun’
During the hearings, Harris hinted strongly that they knew that Kavanaugh had the wrong Special Counsel Robert Mueller ‘ s then discussed ongoing probe with the trump lawyer is associated.
Harris did not provide any evidence for the bombshell allegation that went viral on social media and sent the courtroom into silence, even as they accused directly Kavanaugh lying under oath.
Castro echoed that had committed the mood and said Kavanaugh perjury.
“It is clearer than ever that Brett Kavanaugh lied under oath,” Castro wrote. “He should be indicted. And the Congress should consider the failure of the Department of Justice to investigate to correct the matter.”
The times ” piece also noted that she had well before she has been a Federal Kavanaugh-is one of the judges “at least seven people”, as Kavanaugh exposed, allegedly, to Deborah Ramirez at a party.
Ramirez had as a classmate at Yale after confirmation of your story, and even said some of their classmates that could not have been reported to remember the perpetrators in the alleged episode — before the change to rate their thoughts, and public debt Kavanaugh “after six days of carefully your memories, and consultation with your lawyer,” the New Yorker ” last year, in a wide piece of mocked.
The legal Committee has then led by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said in a summary of its investigation, that it contacted Ramirez’s counsel “seven times looking for evidence of the allegations in the “the New Yorker”, but “Mrs Ramirez produced nothing in response, and refused a Committee request for an interview.”
In addition, the FBI reached separately, 11 people confirm the claims made by Ford and Ramirez, and ultimately spoke to ten people and two witnesses. But the FBI found no confirmation.
To be Kavanaugh, predicted by the Democrats during his confirmation process, a hard-line, conservative, often sided with liberal judges, while the Supreme court in the last term.
The President, meanwhile, accused the media of trying to influence him. He also went on to say that Kavanaugh should go on the offensive, which the media for making false statements.
“Brett Kavanaugh should start suing for libel, or the Ministry of justice should come to his rescue. The lies about him incredibly are told. False accusations, no recriminations. When does it end? You try to influence his opinions. Can’t let that happen!”
Ramirez was one of several women accused Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct during his confirmation process. Christine Blasey Ford testified that Kavanaugh tries to sexually assault you were at a party when a teenager. Her lawyer, Debra Katz, was quoted in a new book than to say that Ford was motivated, forward to the desire to Kavanaugh the day ‘ s reputation with a “star in a part of”, before he could begin, the decision on abortion-related cases.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“In the Wake of these hearings, I believe that Christine’s testimony brought more good than the damage that the woman caused to enemy Republicans, by Kavanaugh to the court,” said Katz. “He will always be an asterisk next to his name. If he takes a scalpel to Roe v. Wade, we know who he is, we know his character, and we know what motivates him, and this is important.
“It is important that we know, and that’s part of what motivated Christine.”
Fox News’ Ronn Blitzer contributed to this report.