Judge rules that lawsuit against Trump on foreign gifts can move

The Trump International Hotel in Washington in 2016 photo is seen in this December.

(AP Photo/Alex Brandon, file)

WASHINGTON – A Federal judge on Wednesday allowed to go to Maryland and the District of Columbia with their lawsuit accusing President Donald Trump to accept gifts from foreign interests, but not limited to the case of the President, the involvement with the Trump International Hotel in Washington is unconstitutional.

U.S. District Judge Peter J. Messitte dismissed-judgment, other parts of the suit, the concerns about the impact of foreign gifts to the President of the Trump organization properties outside of Washington.

Maryland and DC are accusing the President of violating the civil servants ‘ salaries clause of the Constitution prohibits the President and other Federal officials accepting gifts from foreign governments and U.S. States. Specifically, they claim that shops in the vicinity were exposed to increased competition as a result of the foreign traffic on the Trump Hotel.

“Their claim is supported by explicit statements of certain foreign government officials, indicating that they are clearly the choice for the stay in the President hotel, because, as a representative of a foreign government has declared that they want him to know, `I love your new hotel”,’ Messitte wrote in his 47-page judgment.

But the judge also warned the plaintiffs that their “claims sweep to say,” to, “it is a considerable distance, however, the necessary injury-in-fact” to Maryland and DC, Trump, real estate outside of Washington.

Despite Messitte limited decision, a watchdog group, has orders for two right in the action, the decision of the judge was quick to hail.

“This is a big step forward for the compensation of litigation,” said Norman Eisen, a former chief ethics lawyer for the Obama administration and Chairman of the citizens for responsibility and ethics in Washington, also as a TEAM. Iron, said the decision suggests to sue that States and businesses in the vicinity of Trump’s companies in other parts of the country can also be a legal standing.

Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh said: “we won the first round. It is a very clear decision that Donald Trump will not be pulled above the law and must be accountable to the remuneration of officials clause.”

DC attorney General Karl Racine, tweeted: “We stand by Pres. Trump responsible for the violation of the Constitution.”

It was not immediately clear whether the trump of administration, the judgment would be right.

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders refused to have the Problem during an afternoon press conference: “I can’t comment on pending litigation.”

Kerri Kupec, a Justice Department spokeswoman, said: “we believe this case should be dismissed, and we will continue to defend the President in court.”

Although the Trump organization was not a party to the dispute, the company said it was not satisfied that the judge will allow the lawsuit to the target, the other trump properties.

“The court’s decision of today can significantly narrow the scope of the case,” said a company spokeswoman. The court has yet to rule on a number of additional arguments, which we believe should lead to a complete dismissal.”

If the judge’s decision holds, it could allow Maryland and DC to press for documents that demonstrate how the foreign interests of the government or of the US States used the Trump hotel and how much money you spent there.

At the end of last year, a judge in New York has tossed out a similar lawsuit filed by the CREW, the decision that the salaries of the officials-clause is a Problem that Congress should be the first address. A third Federal lawsuit has been filed against Trump on the output of almost 200 democratic members of Congress.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular