Interjection, drama mark House hearing on slavery reparations, such as at the top of The asks, ” Why not now?’

in the vicinityVideoRep. Shelia Lee Jackson describes the historical grievances and the impact of slavery

Congressman Lee Jackson discusses the impact of slavery during the House Judiciary Committee hearing.

The question of slavery reparations for black Americans was the topic of a heated and emotional House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday, as Democrats called the measures for the solution of America’s “original sin” – while the Republicans described such payments as “injustice” and “almost certainly unconstitutional.”

The Constitution, civil rights and Civil liberties of the sub-Committee held the hearing on H. R. 40 — a bill by Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee, D-Texas, the establishment of a Commission to study and develop an answer to the question of reparations for slavery.


Democrats such as former President Barack Obama and 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton against such a costly plan in the past. But in the midst of a steady change in the party of the left, the Problem has been given new life with the support of 2020 of hope, and others — but the details remain vague to what form it should take such repairs, with estimates for a controversial direct payments to slave descendants run into the trillions.

“The role of the Federal government in supporting the institution of slavery and the subsequent discrimination against blacks is an injustice that must be officially recognized and addressed,” Jackson-Lee said.

“I simply ask: Why not and why not now?” she said.

Sen. Cory Booker, D-N. J., who was running for President, and has introduced a version of Jackson-Lee’s bill in the Senate, said it is wrong, the topic is as a in the USA a check for the other, and urged the legislature to come up with the deal, what he said still racism in America.

Citing racial differences on issues such as health and education, he said, America has a ” criminal justice system “, that is a form of new Jim Crow is, in fact.”


“And so we have not recognized as a nation, really, and fought against racism and white supremacy, has said the country is an attack on the founding and continues into the depths of racial differences and inequalities today,” he said.

The Republicans, who detected, in the meantime, the horrors of slavery, but said that the reparations are not the way forward. Congressman Mike Johnson, R-La., was booed and heckled fallen, during his speech.

“Apart from the injustice of the monetary reparations from current taxpayers for the sins of a small subset of Americans who said by many generations before, the equitable distribution of reparations would be almost impossible, considering the complexity of the American struggle for the abolition of slavery,” he said.

He quoted a former NAACP assistant director, appeal redress, “an illogical diversionary and paltry way out for guilt-ridden-and-white” – and was booed to say, these measures would be unconstitutional “with a probability bordering on certainty on her face.”

His comments echo those of Senate majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who said on Tuesday that he had agreed with the plans for the reparations.

“I think we are always a work in progress, in this country, but no one was currently alive responsible for that, and I don’t think we should try to figure out how to replace it. First of all, it would be pretty hard to figure out, to compensate for who,” he said. “No, I don’t think reparations are a good idea.”

At another point in the hearing, Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert accused Democrats have racists in the ranks decades ago and added: “It is important that we know our history, and we do not punish people for the sins of your predecessors in the Democratic party.” At this point someone from the audience shouted: “You lie.”

Activist and actor Danny Glover also testified at the hearing, as the author Ta-Nehisi Coates, who wrote an influential 2014 essay on the topic and criticized McConnell of names in the Wednesday hearing. He said that America was the payment of pensions to the heirs of the civil war veterans in this century, and still honors a hundred-year-old contracts.

“Many of us would like to be able to be taxed, for the things that we are solely and personally responsible, but we are American citizens, and thus in a collective company, which said far more than our individual and personal reach,” he said.

But Quilette writer Coleman Hughes said that while he did not believe that the payment of reparations directly to freed slaves after the civil war, “one of the greatest injustices of our desire to fix the past, present ever perpetrated by the U.S. government,” he said, “whether it compromises our ability to solve.”

“Black people don’t need another excuse, we need safer schools, neighborhoods and better, we need a less punitive criminal justice system, we need affordable health care, and none of these things can be achieved with reparations for slavery,” he said, to some Boos from onlookers.


“If we are to reparations, the today, we would continue the division of the country, so that to build it is more difficult for the political coalitions to solve the problems of black people today.”

As he finished his statement, Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., boo-ers told to “chill out” and seemed to show but his own irritation at some of Hughes’ remarks, when he said that the witness was “preliminary, but he still had to speak right.”


Meanwhile, former NFL players and conservative author Burgess Owens drew attention to the democratic party as a historically responsible for the injustices against black Americans, the slavery, the Ku Klux Klan, the literacy rates for black American-Americans in Democratic States and cities.

“How about the democratic party brought in to pay for all the misery of my race, and those who remain after you learn our story, there … and every white American, Republican or Democrat, who feels guilty, because of their white skin pony must should to also — so we can pass it, make amends and realize that this country has given to us in size,” he said.

In the middle of the back and forth of whether reparations should be considered, there was hardly any details of what form this would take a package. Democrats brushed off the idea that such a payment would be a direct money payment.

Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-NY, said that “the most severe reparations proposed models, so far, in restorative community-based programs for employment, health care, housing and education initiatives — the ends of injustice, which can not be corrected erections, by controls alone.”

This is reminiscent of the proposals of top-2020 Democrats, the information on the form would take reparations. Sr., Kamala Harris, D-Calif., hit The Grio in February that it is also a generic tax credit for families could make under $100,000 — much less controversial proposal.


Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., now gone a step further and said that the native Americans should be in America “part of the conversation.”

The caution about the specific cash payments of Democrats reflects an opposition to such measures by the public-at-large. The New York Times quoted estimates of experts, said that the reparation measures could cost several trillion dollars.

A Fox News poll in April found that 60 percent of Americans against cash reparations for the descendants of the slaves, while only 32 percent support it. However, the survey also found that among Democratic primary voters, 54 percent said they were likely to do to support a candidate that was backed up, while 33 percent said they were not likely to do this.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular