News

IFAB recommends that the VAR only if it is evident that buitenspelsituaties-to-use

According to the spelregelcommissie IFAB should only be used with the VAR, if a player is in an offside position. The champions League began over the weekend, a lot of controversy about the videoscheidsrechter because of the more controversial disallowed goals.

“There are not a lot of time to be spent in ambiguous situations,” said secretary Lukas Brud of the IFAB on Monday against the news of the PA. “If there are several minutes may be necessary in order to determine whether it is offside or it is not, then the original decision will stand.”

In the Premier League, it was a Sunday and a goal in the Most for Wolverhampton Wanderers against Liverpool was rejected after the intervention of the VAR, because the Portuguese, just a few centimeters is in an offside was. Later in the evening, happened to be the same as Lys Mousset, on behalf of Sheffield United, having scored against Manchester City.

The new run of Most of it led to anger at Wolverhampton’s manager, Nuno Espírito Santo, who has a yellow card was given by referee Anthony Taylor. Also, City’s coach, Josep Guardiola, and Sheffield United’s manager Chris Wilder was disappointed about the value.

“If it’s on the first glance it is not obvious, you should not need to be considered,” says Brud. “It wasn’t the idea to get the value to enter in the situation, from fifteen angles, to see and to try to find something that wasn’t.”

July new manager, Nuno Espírito Santo, was furious, after the new gymnasium for the club. (Photo: Pro-Shots)

“When an ambiguity, should the original decision stand’

The Liverpool-Wolverhampton and Manchester-Sheffield, United were just another Premier League match in a very short period of time, which have been overshadowed by the debate over the value at risk. On Saturday, all of the different bets that rejected due to the use of the controversial offside lines, which, to the inch, looking at whether or not someone is in the buitenspelpositie is.

“What we really need to emphasize is that in any situation in which the risk is assessed, it must be understood”, said the German. “In theory, it is excluded as a person-one millimetres in an offside position. However, as the VAR tries to five -, six -, seven -, ten -, or twelve angles, to see if it is offside, then the original decision should stand.”

“The problem is that people are trying to be legal and to be. It is not intended to be an improved choice, but to get the obvious bugs out,” explains Brud out.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular