HONG KONG (Reuters) – Huawei, said the patent talks with US carrier Verizon, is the “normal” activities, and that such negotiations should not be “politicized”, a day after the senate tabled the legislation in order to prevent the Chinese, the company is seeking damages in a Us court.
A FILE PHOTO of A Huawei logo is seen at the CES (Consumer Electronics Show) in Asia to 2019, in Shanghai, China, 11 June, 2019 at the latest. (REUTERS photo/Aly Song, File/Photo
The company has demanded that It pay a licensing fee to more than 230 of the telecommunications-equipment maker’s patents, and is seeking more than $1 billion, one person told Reuters, against a backdrop of a mounting U.S.-china trade tensions.
Republican Senator Marco Rubio has outlined Huawei’s request as “without merit” and filed the legislation as an amendment to the U.S. defense and law of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) – which places a broad prohibition on the use of federal funds to the purchase of Huawei products, citing national security concerns.
“We just don’t believe that Marco Rubio’s amendment would not be adopted as a law,” Huawei’s chief legal officer, Song Liuping, said in the company’s Shenzhen headquarters on Thursday.
Intellectual property (ip) rights should not be politicized”, the Song used to say. The “IP address” is a private property issue, and the need to be ahead of the competition, market, lectures, readings, and any other liabilities that countries have between each of them.
Song added that, Huawei is the opportunity to discuss patent licensing with companies in the United States, Europe, and other parts of the world, on a regular basis.
As with the proposed action, Rubio’s, a number of steps to make the law, legislators have successfully passed the NDAA in the past to crack down on the Chinese company.
Huawei, the world’s largest telecom equipment maker and No. 2 mobile phone maker, denies its products pose a serious threat to the security and asked to go back to fight in the AMERICAN courts, and, as Washington put it on a “black list” to export, in the last month.
It’s recently been called up to the US administration over the NDAA.
The Chinese company also accused of CNEX Labs, Inc., alleging misuse of a trade secret, with the memory control technology of the californian semi-conductor, designer, and poaching of staff.
A U.S. jury on Wednesday cleared CNEX grant from the U.S. company does not have any damage to their own trade-theft claims.
Analysts have said the Smartphone may be more likely to want to make money with its patents in the US is that the market ban, and a supplier of a prohibition imposed on it by Washington, is expected to cost the company $30 million in sales per year.
However, as the Song said Huawei has no intention of weaponizing the company’s intellectual property rights, following in the footsteps of its founder and CEO, Ren Zhengfei earlier this month.
Huawei, which has received more than $1.4 billion in licensing revenues since 2015, it is against the charging of excessive royalties, Song said, adding the firm had never been asked by any court to be infringing on the intellectual property damages.
“We are not going to work with a company with an important source of income it’s that easy,” Song said, adding that Huawei will continue to focus on its core business-to-business on the top line.
Huawei paid more than $6 billion in royalties to the legal implementation of the IP by other companies, and has provided 87,805 patents, one of which 11,152 its patents in the U.S., the Song was saying.
Huawei has made the most of 5 g of standard essential patents in the world, according to the consultancy, IPlytics.
Reporting by Sijia Jiang of Hong Kong,; Writing by Sayantani Ghosh, the Editing, the ipad is Himani