close tovideo Clinton: Democrats need someone who can win the Electoral College
Polls show tight 2020-race in battleground States; the National Review weighs in at Rich Lowry.
Former U.S. Secretary of state Hillary Clinton on Wednesday expressed caution in the direction of the progressive policy of some of the 2020 Democrats advocate, including “Medicare for all” and a wealth tax, the latter of which warned they would be “incredibly disruptive.”
To comment on will appear in The New York Times DealBook conference, which requested 2016 presidential candidate, Sen. Elizabeth Warren ‘ s “Medicare for all” plan in comparison to adding a “public option,” a proposed aspect of ObamaCare, which was later dropped.
“I think the debate within the Democratic party is to try a very healthy debate to find out how to reach the goal, covers all with the quality, affordable health care,” Clinton began. “My view on this, with work for many years, is that the Affordable Care Act has led us to 90 per cent of the reporting, the highest, get the we ever in our country, after many efforts,… we have to fill a 10-percent gap, and we have a lot to learn about the best way to not only fill the gap, but then drive down costs as much as it is possible to do this without the advances in quality.”
The former New York senator claimed that the “smarter” in the health sector was to “build on what we have,” speak highly of the public option.
ABC NEWS’ SPIKING OF EPSTEIN STORY DRAWS THE CONTROL IN THE DIRECTION OF CLINTON ALLY GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS
“I don’t think we should be in the middle of a big interruption, while we try to get 100-percent coverage, and deal with the costs and face some tough questions about the competitiveness and other types of innovation in healthcare,” the Democrat. “If you take a look at the 2018 election, you will take a look at the profits that were made by Democrats [on Tuesday, elections], the people who say, ‘You know what, I’m determined-we’re gonna get to a universal coverage, we will get to the point where people can afford their premiums are not too erratic, their deductibles will not be overwhelming, et cetera — and here is the best way to do it.’This is, I think, the best position politically, and I also think that it makes the most sense in terms of the solution of the problem.”
Former U.S. Secretary of state Hillary Clinton had words of warning for the Democrats the support of “Medicare for all” and a wealth tax. (SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images, Montage)
When pressed, if you could responded with “behind” Warren ‘ s plan, Clinton, by the expression, that it is not going to happen in the Senate, but stressed that “the goal is the right goal.”
Clinton continued, “The details will be held in the campaign, perhaps even before the court, but certainly in the Congress, when someone is elected successfully. And, I think, it is important to say what the objectives are, and how realistic is it that we achieve the overall objectives, if we go down path A compared to path B? And I think that the Affordable Care Act-approach is the more likely way to be successful.”
Clinton was later asked about the property tax, which has promoted Warren. After he did not “know much” about the proposal, Clinton suggested it was practical.
“I just don’t understand how this could work, and I do not see other examples everywhere prepared to work elsewhere in the world, where there are actually over a long period of time,” Clinton. “I would be all tax in favor of the re-introduction of the inheritance, because this is much more measurable. It is not as annoying.”
She continued, “If it is a tax on wealth were to do, and it was on assets… how would it’s value, I think, to complicated, to begin with. But, provided you can get a system of evaluation, the people would literally have to sell assets to pay levied the tax on the assets that they owned before the property tax was. That would be incredibly distracting, so I think there are other ways to increase revenue.”
CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP
The former presidential candidate also insisted that she would get, who is behind the Democrats nominated for President, no matter what. She also said she thought she knew, “who is it likely to be.”
Grinning, she added, “But I’m not going to go there.”