Dems to introduce resolution of the formalization of the prosecution investigation procedures

in the proximity ofvideo impeachment must be continued, because the majority of Americans support: the former DNC official

Former Deputy national press Secretary for the DNC Jose Aristimuno is defending the house Democrats ” impeachment proceedings against President Trump.

House Democrats formalize on Tuesday a resolution to form their indictment request and adoption of rules for implementing the method according to the persistence of complaints from Republicans in Congress and the White house that the mysterious investigation followed past precedent, the against the President of the due process rights.

But, what is involved is the tight balancing act, as the 2020 election cycle has begun, the Democrats have stubbornly denied that the document districts, an “impeachment resolution,” perhaps out of concern for how the label would play out in a moderate swing.

The resolution directs the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, financial services, justice, and the ways and means Committee to “continue its ongoing investigation in the framework of the existing house of representatives, investigation of whether sufficient persistent’ll give points for the house of representatives for the exercise of its constitutional power, Donald John Trump charges.”


There is, the ranking Republican in the minority on the judiciary and intelligence committees have the authority, with the approval of the Committee Chairman in the majority, to subpoena witnesses and compel their testimony — a key demand that the White house and top Republicans have had in the last few weeks. If the Chairman is unable, the consent of the minority appealed to the Committee as a whole.

The resolution also permits the Intelligence Committee to conduct “an open hearing or hearings” in the minority, Republicans have witnesses time the issue.

And, after this consultation is completed, to allow “for a more complete assessment of the minority witness requests, the ranking minority member can submit described, the Chairman, in writing, all of the requirements for the statement of the witness relevant to the investigation, which is given in the first paragraph of this resolution within 72 hours after notification.”

Shortly before the resolution, House majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md was filed., Fox News said flatly on Tuesday that “this is not an impeachment resolution.”

He gave no response when asked whether he was concerned about the public perception of the term.

“Trouble is coming’: Carville, says Trump impeachment train has left the station

Former Bill Clinton campaign manager, James Carville, says the trump-management is not ready for what lies ahead; reaction and analysis on ” under-place.’

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., also insisted Monday night, “It’s not an impeachment resolution.”

Four Democratic Committee chairmen — Reps. Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, Eliot L. Engel, and Carolyn Maloney — said in a statement on Tuesday that “the resolution provides rules for the format of the open hearings in the House Intelligence Committee, including staff-led questioning of witnesses, and the publication of the deposition, authorized transcripts … [it] defines the procedures for the transfer of evidence in the justice Committee considers potential indictment, and it sets out due process rights for the President and his Council in the judiciary Committee.”

She added: “The evidence we have already collected the image of a President paints, of the abuse of power, to interfere by a plurality of levers of the government press of a foreign country, in the 2020 election. Following In the footsteps of the previous prosecution requests, the next phase of the movement of closed deposits will be open hearings where the American people will learn first-Hand about the President’s misconduct.”

Earlier in the day, the top Republican on the house committees impeachment investigation, the President blasted the investigation as “illegitimate” and a “sham,” signaling the new procedure would not change your mind.

House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes, R-Calif., Oversight Committee Ranking member Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and in the Foreign Affairs Committee Ranking member Michael McCaul, R-Texas, wrote a letter to Rep. James McGovern, the Chairman of the House Rules Committee, announced that his panel would take an impeachment resolution on Wednesday to “transparency and a clear path forward.”


Nunes, Jordan and McCaul accused McGovern, D-Mass., the check enough time for the Republican members to, the resolution before the vote, and continues to blast the request as a whole.

“It is not an impeachment resolution.”

— House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

“Under the house rules, which you championed, at the beginning of this Congress, important legislation that is required to be published 72 hours in advance of a vote,” she wrote. “But, here, on the largest and most solemn work of the house can do, you do not force to look at the house, a resolution with text that is still available two days before the vote.”

“Without text, we don’t know about the Democrats” intended impeachment process. Their website describes the resolution as ” a Director of certain committees will continue their ongoing investigation,” the. “The Chairman ship does not need a resolution to continue to leak selective facts from his basement bunker.”

She added: “We can only assume, therefore, that this resolution is necessary in order for the Democrats to dig in and the ordinary legislation.”

Still, the Democrats have appeared to be the’ solution to address the White house, complaints from earlier this month when it vowed not to participate in the investigation.


Democrats, the White house complained, had not allowed the Republicans to authorize the minority to issue subpoenas, in contradiction to the “standard cross-party practice in all the newer resolutions and the author of presidential impeachment inquiries.”

The White house had also argued: “In the history of our nation, the house of representatives has never tried to start a law enforcement investigation against the President without a majority in the house to approve the political responsibility for the decision by vote, such a dramatic constitutional step.”

Fox News’ Chad Pergram and Brooke Singman contributed to this report.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular