DACA program should be fully restarted, Federal judge rules

in the vicinity


Judges that the DACA program is restarted

Analysis from the ‘Special Report’ All-Star panel.

A Federal judge on Friday ordered a total reboot of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, a hit to the Trump administration.

The administration announced last year its plan to exit from the program, offers a level of Amnesty for certain illegal immigrants, many of whom came to the U.S. as children.

The order is not kick off set to the right, Politically, of the notes that the government has until Aug. 23, application, appeal against the decision of U.S. district judge John Bates.

But the judge refused to review a motion by the government, its earlier decision in April — and have determined that the Department of Homeland Security, the decision was to rescind DACA “unlawful”, according to court documents.


According to the decision, the court issued a 90-day stay, to acknowledge that the “DHS could remedy the decision’s shortcomings-at least in theory.” The time is now, said the judge.

To read “for the reasons below rejected the government declared the motion,” the document. “Although the Nielsen Memo purports to give you further explanation for the DHS decision to rescind DACA, it’s not too time-consuming useful to the Agency is the primary justification for its decision: the judgment that the Directive is unlawful and unconstitutional.”

Trump administration last year announced its plan to phase-out of the DACA program, which is a measure of Amnesty for certain illegal immigrants, many of whom came to the U.S. as children.


The above-mentioned memo of the DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen provided, “to make additional ‘political’ reasons” undo DACA, wrote the judge. However, he added that “most of these simply unpack the legal arguments previously made,” so that you “‘not sufficiently independent of the Agency for the evaluation of DACA ‘legality’, so that the judicial review or to support the Agency’s decision.”

When you close the short, the judge wrote that at no point in this decision, or the last, the court argued that the DHS is not “the statutory and constitutional authority” to exit the program.

“Rather, the court simply asserted that, if the DHS want from the program or other measures, for that matter – there is a rational explanation for his decision wrote,” the judge.

“A conclusory assertion that a prior Directive is illegal, accompanied by a hodgepodge of illogical or post-hoc-policy-assertions, it is not easy to do,” the judge wrote. “The court therefore reaffirms its conclusion that the IF’ s resignation was unlawful and must be repealed.”


The DACA program was created through Executive action by former President Barack Obama in 2012 and allows certain people who came to the United States illegally be protected as minors from immediate deportation. Receiver, widely known as a dreamer, able consideration of deferred action were require to “on” for a period of two years, the theme of renewal.

Individuals were able to request DACA status, if you are under the age of 31 years, which came from June 15, 2012, in the United States before 16 and continuously lived in the country since June 15, 2007.

It has no “legal status.”

Fox News’ William Mears and Kaitlyn Schallhorn contributed to this report.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular