closeVideoFox News: Giuliani is not alone in the Biden-Ukraine-probe
Questions continue to mount on Rudy Giuliani’s role in the Biden-Ukraine-probe. Fox News ” Kevin cork reports from Capitol Hill.
Joe Biden’s presidential campaign is not calling for in a letter on Sunday that the major news networks to invite the President of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani more, Giuliani spent the morning on a number of talk shows aggressively makes it clear what he called Biden apparently corrupt machinations in the Ukraine and in China.
The Biden campaign, wrote NBC News, CBS News, Fox News, and CNN-voice “serious concern, to book that you still, Rudy Giuliani to air conspiracy theories spreading of false, debunked in the order of Donald Trump,” according to The Daily Beast, which first reported the existence of the letter.
The memo, Fort authored by Biden’s helper Kate Bedingfield and Anita Dunn: “While you often fact check his statements in real time during the discussions that it is no longer enough. By your air-time, they allow him to introduce the device increasingly out of joint, baseless, and desperate, is it in the national dialogue.”
GIULIANI WAS NOT THE ONLY BIDEN IN UKRAINE-PROBE
A network should Giuliani, the Biden-campaign book called for “an equivalent amount of time” made available “, a surrogate for the Biden campaign.” The letter noted Giuliani was not a public official, but Trump’s attorney and personal Advisor.
Respond to the request, Trump 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale tweeted: “we Can demand that the distance of the Democrats in the television, the push-hoaxes? Wait, but then who is doing the interviews?”
Hours earlier, Giuliani made the rounds on Sunday, several fairs, including “Fox News Sunday” to argue that the evidence of Biden’s possible, the corruption is hiding in plain sight for months.
Biden has confirmed this, camera that, when he was Vice-President he success of the Ukraine under pressure, the fire, the office of the public Prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who was the investigation of the natural gas company Burisma Holdings — where’s son, Hunter Biden had been a very lucrative role on the Board to pay him tens of thousands of dollars per month, despite the limited availability of appropriate expertise. The Vice-President threatened to withhold some $thrown 1 billion in critical U.S. aid, if Shokin was.
“Well, son of a b—h he fired,” Biden joked on a panel two years after leaving office.
Shokin had accused widely of corruption, while critics charged that Hunter Biden, have sold, in essence, may have access to his father, who had pushed Ukraine to increase natural gas production. Giuliani, on Sunday, proposed Shokin was to discredit the target of an international smear campaign to his work.
THE REPUBLICANS WANT TO WHISTLEBLOWER SOURCES, SUCH AS INCONSISTENCIES IN THE COMPLAINT
In a combative interview on ABC News “This Week” on Sunday, Giuliani presented what he said was confirmed by a sworn statement, signed by Shokin, Hunter Biden, has been studied, is, if Shokin was fired.
The “Washington will not press you to accept the fact that Joe did Biden could be something like this.”
— Trump Attorney Rudy Giuliani
“I have an affidavit here online for six months that no one bothered to read the man who was fired, Viktor Shokin, the so-called corrupt state attorney,” Giuliani said. “The Biden people say that he is investigating, Hunter Biden at the time. He says under oath that he was it.” The Shokin affidavit allegedly said the U.S. had pressured him to fall into the resignation because he was not willing, the case.
Later, Giuliani added: “I’ve got another affidavit, this time from a different Ukrainian Prosecutor says that the day after Biden strong-armed the President to remove, Shokin, you show yourself in the Prosecutor’s office — lawyers for Hunter Biden show up in the Prosecutor’s office, and give an apology for spreading false information.”
According to anchor George Stephanopoulos expressed skepticism, Giuliani fired back: “How would you like it if I — how would it be if I tell you, in the course of the next week, four more of these to come out of the other four prosecutors? … No, no, no, no, George, you are not [investigated] because you do not accept been online for six months, and the Washington press is the fact that Joe did Biden could be something like this.”
Rudy Giuliani, if he testifies before the Congress on the Ukraine controversy
Personal lawyer of President Trump, Rudy Giuliani says that if he is called to testify, that he, with his client.
When Stephanopoulos called it “not true” that Hunter Biden would have more than $1 billion from China, while the United States was the negotiations with the country, Giuliani said the former Clinton administration official to be blind.
“There is evidence that they made 1 billion US Dollar directly from China, specific date, 12 days after returning from a trip to China,” Giuliani claimed. “There is evidence that a further 500 million US was dollars, and there are three partners.”
Giuliani continued: “Can I-can I do about it? I can only make a small contrast with the so-called whistleblower? The whistleblower says that I have no direct experience, I’ve just heard things. Until two weeks before he did, wouldn’t that also [have] has been dismissed a complaint would.”
The show is a reference to an explosive report in The Federalist, that the secret services changed recently his form for the reporting of illegal behavior. Earlier this year, the intelligence community’s form for whistleblowers is not explicitly noted that the complaints were due to the on second-hand information usable.
SHIP: TO WITNESS TO THE AGREEMENT FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS
But that admonition was removed sometime after that — to the time, filed by an unnamed whistleblower that a complaint, based on second-hand information of the alleged misconduct in the White house. Although there is no strict legal provision for whistle-blower complaints will only contain first-Hand information, the former secret service people form made it clear that such second-hand complaints would not be investigated, as a matter of procedure.
Twitter-user Stephen McIntyre originally saw the change in the whistleblower form.
Trump and top Republicans demanded answers over the weekend, how, when, and why the form — and to allow whether the change was made, explicitly, that the whistleblower complaint was amended.
Speaking separately on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures,” Giuliani, the oath came back with explanations, and called the situation Clintonesque.
“The pattern is a pattern of numbers. It contains something very similar to what happened to the Clinton Foundation,” said Giuliani, “that goes to the core of what has know Obama, and when he knew it?”
Giuliani referred to in the December 2015 New York Times article on Hunter Biden, Burisma and a Ukrainian oligarch, and how the younger Biden, the commitment of the Ukrainian company may be to undermine then-Vice-President Biden’s anti-corruption message.
“The question is,” asked Giuliani, “if Biden and Obama saw that article about how the son was down money to pull of the most crooked oligarchs in Russia, Biden, Obama to call and say:” Joe, as you might be to do this?'”
Giuliani was not the only lawyer to try to have damaging information about Joe Biden is in the Ukrainian officials and the President of the decision Trump was to refuse the help from the Ukraine this summer, in spite of several Federal authorities for help, Fox News’ Chris Wallace support was reported by “Fox News Sunday.”
In addition to Giuliani, Washington, DC, attorneys Joe DiGenova and his wife Victoria Toensing, worked together with former New York City mayor. According to a top American officials, the three attorneys-off-the-books “were” not within the trump-management-and only the President knows the details of their work.
In a tweet on Sunday, Toensing called the report “wrong” and shameful.” Wallace, in a statement, he replied, “We stand by our reporting.”
WATCH: GIULIANI ON BIDEN TO THE UKRAINE BUSINESS TO THE ALLEGED CLINTON FOUNDATION “PAY-FOR-PLAY COMPARES”
For his part, Giuliani insisted that he “did not work with someone dirt on Joe Biden,” saying that the information “was passed on to me by the Ukrainians.”
Giuliani said that so far, the house Democrats have been invited to testify to him about his work with the Ukraine, but if they did, he would run out of trumps first.
“I’m his lawyer, there is the so-called attorney-client privilege,” he said. “This must be taken into account, even if you don’t think he should privilege attorney-client.”
Democrats have published on the whistleblower complaint, in the last week, which cited information from the White house officials who have been allegedly there are efforts to secure Trump the July-phone call with Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, among other things, talks. The Trump administration, according to reports, the placement transcripts of Trump began ‘s on the phone with several foreign heads of state and government in a high-level repository classified only after an anonymous leak to the public the contents of the Trump to be disseminated’s private conversations with the leaders of Mexico and Australia in the year 2017.
Trump struck during a phone call with Zelensky, Ukraine to look into Biden ‘ to fire s boast Shokin, according to Zelensky, for the first time Ukraine is mentioned in the corruption issues, and Trump requested separately as a “favor” to help Ukraine, to investigate the interference in the elections of 2016, including the hack of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) server with CrowdStrike.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The call came not long after Trump had frozen millions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine. However, the later published U.S. aid to the Ukraine and the Ukrainians were not aware, the money was frozen in the first place until more than a month after Trump’s call with Zelensky, The New York Times reported.
Zelensky said he felt no pressure from trump during the call to do nothing.
The whistleblower complaint contained a number of obvious factual inaccuracies, and some Republicans are calling for an investigation of the whistleblower sources — and why not the appeal itself.
Fox News’ Ronn Blitzer contributed to this report.