Barr rips ‘legal analysis’, in Müller’s report: “It is not necessarily the views of the Department’

in the proximity ofvideo media knock Barr ‘ s probe, FBI

Attorney General asks state attorney to examine, 2016 monitoring.

Attorney General Bill Barr said in an interview broadcast on Friday that he agrees with “a lot of the legal analysis,” inside Special Counsel Robert Müller the report and said it does not “reflect the views” of the Ministry of justice, the latest rupture between the President of Trump’s attorney general and head of the Russia probe.

In a sit-down interview with CBS News’ Jan Crawford, Barr was asked about dealing with his first four-page summary of the Müller ‘ s report, which he shared at the end of March. Barr and the former Deputy General Prosecutor Rod Rosenstein, said they determined that the evidence found in Müller’s sample was not sufficient to charge the President with obstruction of justice, punishable by law.


“We do not agree with the legal analysis that many of the legal analysis, said in the report,” Barr. “It is not necessarily the views of the Department. It is the view of a particular lawyer or lawyers, so we what we saw, was the law.”

Speaking of Müller’s findings on disability, Barr said: “The bottom line was that Bob Mueller were some of the episodes. He didn’t want to to a result. He provided both sides of the issue. And his conclusion was, he was, to the relief of the President, but was not to find a crime.”

Barr’s comments come after Miller made a rare public appearance this week—his first and only in his tenure as special counsel. Müller announced that the investigation was officially completed and that he will live to withdraw from the Ministry of justice back to the private.

Muller details the results of the report, stating that there is “no evidence” of a conspiracy with respect to Russia’s collusion with members of the Trump campaign during the 2016 presidential elections, and said his examination of the decisions in relation to his question, whether the President obstructed justice.

“If we are to trust not, had that of the President committing obvious crimes, we would have said that,” Müller said on Wednesday in the Ministry of justice. “We have not determined whether the President did commit a crime.”

Müller explains the long-standing justice Department policy that States that a President accused of a crime, and added that “charging the President with a crime was an option we could consider.”

“We decided that we can’t reach would be a determination one way or the other about whether the President committed a crime,” Miller said. “This is the office, in its final position.”

But Barr told CBS News that he felt, millers would make an official statement about the request.

“I personally have said the feeling that he had made a decision,” Barr. “The opinion says, you can’t indict a President while he is in office, but he could have made a decision whether it is a criminal offence, but he had his reasons to what he declared.”


Barr added: “I’m not going to argue about the reasons, but if he can’t make a decision, the Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, and I felt it was necessary to achieve for us as a head of the Department, the decision.”

This week, Mueller has also said that, while the Office of the President of misconduct by Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion blocks a President’s impeachment in office, “the Constitution requires a different process than it is to accuse the criminal justice system officially.” Some on the left took that as a green light for the “ramp-up” – talks about the impeachment proceedings against the President.

When asked whether he thought Mueller was suggesting Congress could be the “place” of the President responsible, Barr said he was “not sure.”

“Well, I’m not sure what he suggested,” Barr said in the interview. “You know, the Department of Justice, not our powers of investigation of crimes as a complement to the Congress.”

Barr also responded to Miller’s announcement this week that, despite negotiations with top Congress Committee, he did not testify to the intention to, in public or private.

“It’s Bob, but I think the line that he draws what he is going to stay, what to see in the report, said the correct row for each Department official,” Barr.


To hold earlier this month, the House Judiciary Committee voted Barr in contempt of the Jury defies to request a subpoena, that he is a unredacted version of Mueller’s report, as well as the underlying documents and evidence. In return, the President’s executive privilege over the materials asserted to protect in an attempt to these files from the release.

In spite of the criticism of Barr over his handling of the report, Müller defended him on Wednesday, saying that he was “not out of the question, the attorney general’s good faith” in the decision to release the report in full, with redactions, to the public and the Congress. Müller said that he had suggested that only “parts of the report will be published,” and said that he “appreciated” Barr’s decision.

Meanwhile, Barr has also fallen under intense scrutiny about his testimony last month before a congressional Committee, when he said that he believed that “espionage occur” on the trump campaign during the 2016 presidential elections.

To investigate Barr, since, ordered, the US attorney from Connecticut, John Durham, the origins of the Russian investigation.

When asked about his use of the word “espionage,” Barr said: “I mean, I think it is a dirty word somehow. It has never been for me. I think there is nothing wrong with the spy. The question is always whether it is permitted by law.”

He added: “It is part of the craziness of the modern day, when the President of a word, then suddenly it is off-limits. It is a very good English word, and I will continue to use.”

Barr’s report on the origins of the original Russia investigation of the FBI comes under a number of other studies-specifically led by the justice Department inspector General Michael Horowitz. Horowitz, for over a year, was. the investigation of alleged misconduct in connection with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants– a probe, which is expected to be complete by the end of next month Durham, though, is the collaboration with Durham, FBI Director, Christopher Wray, and Director of the CIA, Gina reel.

But last week, the President signed a memo to declassify documents signed in connection with the 2016-monitoring of the Trump campaign officials. It is unclear what the documents contain, or when they are released.

“I had a lot of questions about what was going on, and I assumed that I would get answers if I went, and I didn’t. get answers to all satisfactory and, in fact, you probably have more questions,” Barr told CBS News “Some of the facts that I’ve learned not to hang together with the official explanations of what happened.”

He added: “That’s all I’m really saying. Things are not simply…tack.”

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular