Amazon is testing the Whole Foods system that makes use of that as the ID


Don’t forget the titanium, and Apple’s Map — Amazon’s new payment method, it makes use of a flesh-and-blood.

The e-tailing giant’s engineers have been quietly testing the scanners, which can identify an individual, human basis, as a way to get into the ring with a store for the purpose of rolling them at the Whole Foods supermarket chain in the coming months, The Post has learned.

Employees at Amazon’s New New York offices to serve as guinea pigs for biometric technology to be used in a handful of vending machines, to buy items such as soft drinks, potato chips, granola bars, and phone chargers, according to sources briefed on the plans.

The high-tech sensors are different from the fingerprint scanner found on devices such as the iPhone, and you do not need the user to physically touch their hands to the area you are scanning.

Instead, they make use of computer vision and the depth of the geometry for the processing and / or detection of the shape and size of each and every hand that they scan it prior to charging the credit card on file.

The system, code-named “Orville,” allows customers with Amazon Prime accounts to scan their hands in the store, and they have to link their credit or debit card.

It is accurate to within one ten-thousandth of 1%, however, Amazon’s engineers have been scrambling to address a millionth of 1% of the launches, the source said.

In the Amazon, hoping to see the introduction of the technology into a handful of Whole Foods stores by the end of the previous year, and, finally, to add to the super-fast checkout-tech to all parts of the united states. The pace of the rollout will depend on how fast and the Whole Foods is in a position to get it to install and train employees on how to use it, the sources said.

“We don’t comment on rumor or speculation,” an Amazon spokesperson said.

As an ordinary card transaction, and usually takes between three and four seconds, Amazon’s new technology that can handle the load of less than 300 milliseconds, to a person who is familiar with the project, he said.

“Retailers have always been interested in higher pay,” Majd Maksad, founder and chief executive officer of the Status, the Money, a personal finance website, told The Post. “You’ll just have to run into Whole Foods to get in the massive lines of people waiting to be checked out. It’s a huge friction point.”

If successful, the technology could also help to encourage consumers to spend more when they are on a visit to Whole Foods, ” he said.

“People have a tendency to spend more when they do not have the experience of touching something tangible, such as money,” Maksad said. “The use of the currency is more ephemeral.”

Amazon’s burgeoning chain of the “Go” from the grocery stores, which launched last year, customers have to use a phone app to check-in at a turnstile. Then, they can fill their pockets, and to carry out, without ever passing through a stop, thanks to the computer, a vision and a set of sensors all over the shop.

With the new hand-based technology, shoppers don’t even need to be on their phones. However, experts say it’s unclear whether or not the customers are going to love scanning their hands at Whole Foods.

Stephanie Hare, an independent researcher who has specialized in the area of technology and ethics, has noted that, in countries with robust surveillance programmes, such as China, are already using biometric collection in some stores and found that Amazon seems to have made a decision not to take advantage of new face detection technology.

“I think she’s likely to be a well-considered decision has been taken and that the Americans are probably not going to be willing to pay for their game, but they will be good to be able to pay with their fingerprint or their hand,” she said. “It feels less like a mug shot.”

Consumers need to protect their sensitive information, Haas said, pointing out that if a company gets hacked, it can take six months or more for the consumer to relax in and the theft of data.

“Why would you want them to, that data. People don’t understand the risks, and they have oversold the benefits,” she said. “We’ve got a few of the nation-states that are really, really good at stealing the data.”

This story was first published in the New York Post.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular