2020 Dems aim to filibuster, say, the Senate, the tradition should go the way of the story”

in the vicinityVideoBeto O’rourke says, he could be in Texas in a General election

The former Texas Congressman rallies voters on the idea that the red state’s 38 electoral votes would be in the game, if he has the democratic nomination in the year 2020; Molly Line reports from the election campaign in Claremont, New Hampshire.

Beto O’rourke add to a growing list of Democratic presidential candidates, consider the scrapping long-standing Senate procedure, in the hope of passing a sweeping progressive agenda, you should make it up in the White house.

Under siege, the filibuster is the long-standing Senate tradition requires 60 votes in the 100-member chamber to advance a bill to block so effectively the minority party legislation.


“I think this is something we should seriously consider,” O’rourke told reporters on the campaign trail in New Hampshire earlier this week.

“We need to take a look at some of these institutional reforms, whether it’s the Supreme court, the Electoral College, the filibuster in the Senate, we have a democracy and our institutions work,” said the former three-term Congressman from Texas.

On the same day that O’rourke entertain the idea of a rival for the democratic nomination also opened the door to the idea of the use of the filibuster.

“If you talk about the change in the filibuster rule, I understand that we, now we are on this way,” sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey said in an interview on “Pod Save America.” “I’ll tell you that for me, the door is not closed.”

The comments mark a growing appetite in the 2020 Democratic field, and a challenge to long-standing political traditions and institutions-everything from the voting age on the Electoral College, the Senate filibuster. And for Booker, his comments mark a backtrack from previous statements.

Last month, Booker NPR said that he was not in favor of the elimination of the filibuster. And in an interview with Politico in January – before he formally declared his candidacy – he said: “we should not mess up anything with the strength of the filibuster. It is one of the distinctive features of this body. And I think it is the power of the filibuster is a good one to have.”

The pro-Republican opposition research shop America Rising, the senator of flip-Flop threw at the Problem, namely, in an E-Mail after the senator’s latest comments, the “Booker jumped on Board with the latest liberal litmus test, the abolition of the filibuster.”


At the moment, the filibuster, the actual help for the democratic party is to slow down their members or stall legislation that the GOP Senate could support the majority, and the Trump White house. Trump himself has called for an end to the filibuster, only met with opposition from Senate majority Leader Mitch McConnell.


But McConnell lowered the threshold, to confirm Supreme Court candidates, a simple majority, and the other a Federal judge and Cabinet nominees are also no longer under the 60-vote threshold. The filibuster on legislation is all that remains in terms of the integrated brakes in the upper chamber, could that slow the majority of the party.

And so Democrats, in the hope of a sweeping progressive agenda passed if they win back the White house are concerned that your proposals will get a bottleneck in the Senate where the Democrats have a Chance to win in control-but barely have a chance to grab a 60-member, filibuster-proof majority.

“Everything remains on the table. You keep all on the table. Do not take anything off the table,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren said, when recently asked on the presidential election campaign on the abolition of the filibuster.

Candidates, major changes in dealing with climate change see also the filibuster as a major obstacle.

“I don’t think you can seriously say, you can. the defeat of the climate change, unless they recognize that we need to make the filibuster go the way of the story, because Mitch McConnell has weapons-grade of the filibuster,” Washington State Gov. Jay Inslee told reporters on Wednesday “You can’t be serious about that significant decarbonisation of the legislation in the short term, without having to remove the filibuster.”

But not all the White house contenders are on Board.

“Good question…Let’s change the subject!”, joked Sen. Kamala Harris from California, when asked by a voter in Iowa about their stance on the issue.

The Harris campaign told Fox News that their candidate has, ” she said, really undecided on this issue, but everything is on the table.”

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand in New York, said, “Pod Save America” in January, “I think it is useful to bring people together, and I don’t think you have to have 60 votes for cloture.”

“If you are not able to get to 60 votes on something, it just means you don’t have to work, hard to talk enough, listen to enough people and try to address your concerns and then come up with a solution that can assist you. And I’m not afraid that it will one way or another,” she added.

Sen Bernie Sanders also opposed the abolition of the filibuster.

“I’m not crazy, the get rid of the filibuster. I think the problem is that people often talk about the lack of comity and the anger. The real Problem is that you in Washington a system that is dominated in Washington by wealthy campaign contributors have,” he said last month in an interview with CBS News.

Follow us

Don't be shy, get in touch. We love meeting interesting people and making new friends.

Most popular